FEZ vs. GMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and GMF (SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while GMF is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEZ returned 11.53%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for GMF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GMF.

Performance

FEZ vs. GMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly lower than GMF's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has outperformed GMF with an annualized return of 11.53%, while GMF has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.

FEZ

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: 6.43%
• 6M: 6.45%
• 1Y: 19.20%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 10.43%
• 10Y*: 11.53%

GMF

• 1D: -3.49%
• 1M: 2.67%
• YTD: 12.22%
• 6M: 12.01%
• 1Y: 28.51%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: 10.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. GMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF	6.43%	37.81%	3.57%	27.16%	-14.27%	14.84%	4.84%	26.04%	-15.85%	24.80%
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF	12.22%	21.99%	16.55%	8.20%	-18.99%	-1.93%	24.96%	19.92%	-14.25%	41.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and GMF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2007	0.69

The correlation between FEZ and GMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEZ vs. GMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FEZ	GMF
Financial Services	23.8%	15.4%
Technology	19.6%	40.8%
Industrials	19.3%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	2.9%
Healthcare	5.6%	4.5%
Energy	5.3%	3.1%
Utilities	5.0%	2.0%
Basic Materials	3.8%	5.8%
Communication Services	2.6%	6.4%
Real Estate	-	1.0%

Return for Risk

FEZ vs. GMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ

FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 30
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

GMF

GMF Risk / Return Rank: 49
GMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
GMF Omega Ratio Rank: 49
GMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GMF Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. GMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FEZ	GMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.61	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.26	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.30	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	2.27	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.82	8.24	-3.42

FEZ vs. GMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the GMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and GMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. GMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, roughly equal to the maximum GMF drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and GMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FEZ	GMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.21%	-67.18%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.63%	-12.62%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.85%	-21.43%	+5.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.05%	-35.76%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.69%	-40.18%	+0.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.33%	-3.49%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.04%	-16.55%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	3.47%	+0.52%

Volatility

FEZ vs. GMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 5.85%, while SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) has a volatility of 8.35%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FEZ	GMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	8.35%	-2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.57%	15.32%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.40%	17.78%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.70%	18.79%	+1.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.75%	19.22%	+1.53%

FEZ vs. GMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GMF's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

FEZ vs. GMF - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than GMF's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF	2.64%	2.78%	2.94%	2.75%	3.06%	2.61%	2.13%	2.61%	3.45%	2.44%	3.35%	3.03%
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF	1.20%	1.49%	1.92%	2.75%	2.54%	2.71%	1.32%	1.75%	2.26%	1.70%	2.49%	3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FEZ and GMF in my portfolio?

FEZ and GMF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FEZ or GMF?

GMF has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to FEZ (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs GMF's -67.18%.

Which ETF is better, FEZ or GMF?

On 10-year performance, FEZ leads with 11.53% vs 10.35% for GMF. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FEZ or GMF?

Over the 10-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FEZ or GMF?

FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FEZ or GMF?

FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 1.20% for GMF.

What is the main difference between FEZ and GMF?

FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while GMF is Asia Pacific Equities. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while GMF tracks S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.49% for GMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.