GMF vs. AIA
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA).
GMF and AIA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. AIA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia 50. It was launched on Nov 13, 2007. Both GMF and AIA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GMF or AIA.
Correlation
The correlation between GMF and AIA is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GMF vs. AIA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GMF:
0.61
AIA:
0.71
GMF:
0.98
AIA:
1.15
GMF:
1.13
AIA:
1.15
GMF:
0.52
AIA:
0.53
GMF:
1.64
AIA:
2.68
GMF:
7.53%
AIA:
7.18%
GMF:
20.15%
AIA:
27.21%
GMF:
-67.18%
AIA:
-60.89%
GMF:
-14.19%
AIA:
-25.28%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMF achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GMF has underperformed AIA with an annualized return of 4.37%, while AIA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.90% annualized return.
GMF
-1.76%
-2.04%
-5.65%
10.10%
7.09%
4.37%
AIA
2.58%
-4.03%
-2.88%
15.81%
5.38%
4.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMF vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GMF vs. AIA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GMF
AIA
GMF vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GMF vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison
GMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than AIA's 2.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 1.95% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 2.54% | 2.71% | 1.32% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 1.55% |
AIA iShares Asia 50 ETF | 2.71% | 2.78% | 2.62% | 2.59% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 2.24% | 2.50% | 1.45% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
GMF vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMF drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, which is greater than AIA's maximum drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMF and AIA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GMF vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) is 11.40%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that GMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.