GMF vs. IEMG
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG).
GMF and IEMG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GMF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. It was launched on Mar 19, 2007. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. Both GMF and IEMG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GMF or IEMG.
Performance
GMF vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMF achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 8.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GMF has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 5.42%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
GMF
16.22%
-5.78%
4.63%
20.19%
5.82%
5.42%
IEMG
8.41%
-5.25%
0.12%
13.35%
3.87%
3.33%
Key characteristics
| GMF | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 0.90 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.84 | 1.34 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.24 | 1.16 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.71 | 0.53 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.15 | 4.42 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.37% | 3.06% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.29% | 15.08% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.18% | -38.72% |
| Current Drawdown | -12.90% | -14.14% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GMF vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMF has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.14% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between GMF and IEMG is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GMF vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GMF vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
GMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than IEMG's 2.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 2.19% | 2.75% | 2.54% | 2.71% | 1.32% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 3.76% | 1.55% | 2.18% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.74% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.34% | 2.28% | 2.52% | 2.30% | 1.76% |
Drawdowns
GMF vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMF drawdown since its inception was -67.18%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMF and IEMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GMF vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) at 4.61%. This indicates that GMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.