FEZ vs. BOTZ
FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FEZ returned 10.55%/yr vs 2.06%/yr for BOTZ. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEZ charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 5.58% return.
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 7.17%
- YTD
- 8.27%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- 1Y
- 21.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.52%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
BOTZ
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- —
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 8.27% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 5.58% | 14.17% | 12.26% | 38.97% | -42.69% | 8.65% | 51.92% | 31.80% | -28.34% | 58.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEZ and BOTZ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016 | 0.71 |
The correlation between FEZ and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEZ
BOTZ
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
FEZ
BOTZ
Industrials
FEZ
BOTZ
Technology
FEZ
BOTZ
Consumer Cyclical
FEZ
BOTZ
Consumer Defensive
FEZ
BOTZ
Healthcare
FEZ
BOTZ
Energy
FEZ
BOTZ
Utilities
FEZ
BOTZ
Basic Materials
FEZ
BOTZ
Communication Services
FEZ
BOTZ
Real Estate
FEZ
-
BOTZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEZ vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
FEZ
BOTZ
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEZ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.28 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 4.20 | +1.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, which is greater than BOTZ's maximum drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEZ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.21% | -55.54% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.63% | -19.34% | +5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.85% | -29.02% | +13.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -55.54% | +20.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.12% | +8.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.05% | -18.28% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 5.86% | -1.86% |
Volatility
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 6.60%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.53%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEZ | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 9.53% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.47% | 19.72% | -4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 25.24% | -6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 26.95% | -6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 25.81% | -4.70% |
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEZ has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEZ vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than BOTZ's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.50% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEZ and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOTZ has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to FEZ (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 5-year performance, FEZ leads with 10.55% vs 2.06% for BOTZ. On fees, FEZ is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FEZ has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 2.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEZ is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.62% for BOTZ.
FEZ is categorized as Europe Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FEZ and 0.68% for BOTZ.
FEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEZ and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer