PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEZ achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 74.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 11.34%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 36.00% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
0.09%
1M
6.20%
YTD
7.29%
6M
8.07%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.34%

ASML

1D
-1.89%
1M
24.09%
YTD
74.80%
6M
73.02%
1Y
146.81%
3Y*
37.59%
5Y*
22.97%
10Y*
36.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
7.29%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
74.80%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and ASML is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002

0.63

The correlation between FEZ and ASML has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEZASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

7.83

-6.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

21.08

-16.68

FEZ vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-90.00%

+25.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-17.85%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-45.38%

+29.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-56.84%

+21.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-56.84%

+17.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.89%

+1.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-28.12%

+11.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

6.63%

-2.62%

Volatility

FEZ vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) is 6.57%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that FEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

17.27%

-10.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

34.58%

-19.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

42.75%

-24.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

42.44%

-21.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

38.72%

-17.61%

Dividends

FEZ vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than ASML's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.47%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.52%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEZ and ASML have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASML has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to FEZ (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer