PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEZ vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEZ vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FEZ at 7.29% and AAPL at 7.29%. Over the past 10 years, FEZ has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 11.34%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.36% annualized return.


FEZ

1D
0.09%
1M
6.20%
YTD
7.29%
6M
8.07%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
17.98%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.34%

AAPL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
7.29%
6M
4.81%
1Y
48.78%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
29.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEZ vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
7.29%37.81%3.57%27.16%-14.27%14.84%4.84%26.04%-15.85%24.80%
AAPL
Apple Inc
7.29%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FEZ and AAPL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002

0.43

The correlation between FEZ and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEZ vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEZ
FEZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
FEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEZ vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEZAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.38

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.40

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

8.47

-4.07

FEZ vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEZ and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEZ vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEZ drawdown since its inception was -64.21%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEZ and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEZAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.21%

-81.80%

+17.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-13.80%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.85%

-33.36%

+17.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-33.36%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.69%

-38.52%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-7.64%

+7.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-29.59%

+12.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

5.53%

-1.52%

Volatility

FEZ vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) and Apple Inc (AAPL) have volatilities of 6.57% and 6.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEZAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

6.73%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.48%

16.53%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

22.64%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

27.52%

-6.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.11%

28.92%

-7.81%

Dividends

FEZ vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

FEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than AAPL's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
FEZ
State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
2.52%2.78%2.94%2.75%3.06%2.61%2.13%2.61%3.45%2.44%3.35%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEZ and AAPL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to FEZ (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEZ dropped -64.21% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEZ and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer