PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEUZ vs. EFNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEUZ achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly lower than EFNL's 21.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEUZ having a 10.35% annualized return and EFNL not far behind at 10.07%.


FEUZ

1D
-0.85%
1M
3.37%
YTD
11.32%
6M
15.72%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.35%

EFNL

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.63%
YTD
21.03%
6M
25.68%
1Y
48.56%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
11.32%56.34%1.64%17.24%-19.83%11.93%5.04%22.06%-20.61%36.70%
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
21.03%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FEUZ and EFNL is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2014

0.71

The correlation between FEUZ and EFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEUZ
EFNL

Industrials

27.4%
20.8%

Energy

10.8%
5.2%

Financial Services

10.6%
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
6.6%

Utilities

8.3%
4.0%

Basic Materials

7.5%
6.3%

Technology

6.1%
21.4%

Real Estate

6.0%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
2.9%

Healthcare

5.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.6%

Industrials

FEUZ
27.4%
EFNL
20.8%

Energy

FEUZ
10.8%
EFNL
5.2%

Financial Services

FEUZ
10.6%
EFNL
26.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FEUZ
9.2%
EFNL
6.6%

Utilities

FEUZ
8.3%
EFNL
4.0%

Basic Materials

FEUZ
7.5%
EFNL
6.3%

Technology

FEUZ
6.1%
EFNL
21.4%

Real Estate

FEUZ
6.0%
EFNL
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEUZ
5.3%
EFNL
2.9%

Healthcare

FEUZ
5.2%
EFNL
3.5%

Communication Services

FEUZ
3.7%
EFNL
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEUZ vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEUZ
FEUZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FEUZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FEUZEFNLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

6.16

-3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

21.80

-12.38

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEUZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is lower than the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEUZ and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FEUZEFNLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.83

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.34

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.50

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.47

-0.03

Drawdowns

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEUZ drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, which is greater than EFNL's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEUZ and EFNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEUZEFNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-38.70%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-7.92%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-18.19%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.64%

-38.70%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.08%

-38.70%

-9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.44%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.49%

-10.93%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

2.23%

+1.06%

Volatility

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF (FEUZ) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) have volatilities of 6.59% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEUZEFNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

6.77%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.34%

13.87%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.31%

17.28%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.96%

19.60%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

20.09%

+1.69%

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEUZ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEUZ vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

FEUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than EFNL's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
2.81%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
FEUZ
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF
2.37%2.81%2.01%2.95%3.14%2.52%1.46%1.93%2.46%1.29%2.12%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEUZ and EFNL have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFNL has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FEUZ (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEUZ dropped -48.08% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

On 10-year performance, FEUZ leads with 10.35% vs 10.07% for EFNL. On fees, EFNL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FEUZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEUZ has performed better with a 10.35% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFNL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.

EFNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.37% for FEUZ.

FEUZ tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Eurozone Index, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEUZ and 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEUZ and EFNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer