FERG vs. AHT.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FERG (Ferguson plc) and AHT.L (Ashtead Group plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FERG in Industrial Distribution, AHT.L in Rental & Leasing Services. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FERG vs. AHT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ferguson plc (FERG) and Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FERG is traded in USD, while AHT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AHT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

FERG

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -8.62%
• YTD: 4.32%
• 6M: -6.49%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 12.61%
• 10Y*: 18.19%

AHT.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERG vs. AHT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FERG Ferguson plc	4.32%	29.90%	-8.62%	55.10%	-27.17%	56.42%	33.97%	49.90%	-14.35%	23.91%
AHT.L Ashtead Group plc	5.76%	12.01%	-9.22%	23.63%	-27.91%	72.67%	49.00%	56.44%	-21.34%	40.47%

Correlation

The correlation between FERG and AHT.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2010	0.25

The correlation between FERG and AHT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap FERG : $44.72B AHT.L : £22.76B
EPS FERG : $10.54 AHT.L : £3.08
PE Ratio FERG : 21.78 AHT.L : 17.45
PEG Ratio FERG : 1.96 AHT.L : 0.68
PS Ratio FERG : 1.43 AHT.L : 2.11
PB Ratio FERG : 7.61 AHT.L : 3.07
Total Revenue (TTM) FERG : $31.63B AHT.L : £10.86B
Gross Profit (TTM) FERG : $9.72B AHT.L : £7.48B
EBITDA (TTM) FERG : $2.75B AHT.L : £4.91B

Return for Risk

FERG vs. AHT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERG

FERG Risk / Return Rank: 50
FERG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FERG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FERG Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FERG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FERG Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERG vs. AHT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferguson plc (FERG) and Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FERG	AHT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FERG	AHT.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FERG	AHT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.91%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.81%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FERG	AHT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.70%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.33%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.04%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.50%	—	—

Dividends

FERG vs. AHT.L - Dividend Comparison

FERG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than AHT.L's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHT.L Ashtead Group plc	1.51%	1.62%	1.62%	1.51%	1.63%	0.71%	1.18%	1.66%	2.02%	1.38%	1.42%	1.36%
FERG Ferguson plc	1.89%	1.12%	1.84%	1.57%	2.76%	2.34%	2.33%	2.43%	3.75%	3.52%	1.11%	0.00%

Financials

FERG vs. AHT.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ferguson plc and Ashtead Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FERG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 7.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

AHT.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ashtead Group plc reported a gross profit of 547.34M and revenue of 2.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

FERG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 612.00M and revenue of 7.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

AHT.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ashtead Group plc reported an operating income of 704.40M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.8%.

FERG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 414.00M and revenue of 7.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

AHT.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ashtead Group plc reported a net income of 316.43M and revenue of 2.96B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FERG and AHT.L in my portfolio?

FERG and AHT.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.