PortfoliosLab logo
FERG vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FERG and COST is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FERG vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ferguson plc (FERG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FERG:

-0.30

COST:

1.29

Sortino Ratio

FERG:

-0.22

COST:

1.81

Omega Ratio

FERG:

0.97

COST:

1.24

Calmar Ratio

FERG:

-0.29

COST:

1.65

Martin Ratio

FERG:

-0.59

COST:

4.74

Ulcer Index

FERG:

16.22%

COST:

6.04%

Daily Std Dev

FERG:

32.24%

COST:

22.13%

Max Drawdown

FERG:

-55.35%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

FERG:

-17.37%

COST:

-3.28%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FERG:

$36.59B

COST:

$461.34B

EPS

FERG:

$8.13

COST:

$17.16

PE Ratio

FERG:

22.43

COST:

60.62

PEG Ratio

FERG:

1.43

COST:

5.51

PS Ratio

FERG:

1.22

COST:

1.75

PB Ratio

FERG:

6.67

COST:

18.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

FERG:

$22.59B

COST:

$205.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FERG:

$6.84B

COST:

$27.77B

EBITDA (TTM)

FERG:

$2.16B

COST:

$8.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERG achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FERG has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 14.43%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 24.24% annualized return.


FERG

YTD

5.59%

1M

5.85%

6M

-14.72%

1Y

-9.80%

3Y*

17.59%

5Y*

21.08%

10Y*

14.43%

COST

YTD

13.80%

1M

3.16%

6M

7.29%

1Y

29.10%

3Y*

32.50%

5Y*

29.64%

10Y*

24.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ferguson plc

Costco Wholesale Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FERG vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FERG is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FERG is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FERG is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FERG is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FERG is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FERG is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FERG vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferguson plc (FERG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FERG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERG and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FERG vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

FERG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than COST's 0.46% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FERG
Ferguson plc
1.78%1.84%1.57%2.76%2.34%2.33%2.27%9.77%1.99%2.15%2.77%2.59%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.46%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

FERG vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERG drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERG and COST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FERG vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Ferguson plc (FERG) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.12%. This indicates that FERG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FERG vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferguson plc and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
6.87B
63.72B
(FERG) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FERG vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ferguson plc and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
29.7%
15.1%
(FERG) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
FERG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 6.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

FERG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 410.00M and revenue of 6.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

FERG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 276.00M and revenue of 6.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.