AHT.L vs. DPLM.L

In the year-to-date period, AHT.L achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly lower than DPLM.L's 13.80% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT.L has underperformed DPLM.L with an annualized return of 16.15%, while DPLM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.78% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Diploma plc (DPLM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AHT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the DPLM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AHT.L and DPLM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AHT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than DPLM.L's 0.93% yield.

The maximum AHT.L drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than DPLM.L's maximum drawdown of -82.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT.L and DPLM.L.

Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to Diploma plc (DPLM.L) at 4.29%. This indicates that AHT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DPLM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashtead Group plc and Diploma plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.