PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FERG vs. TSLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FERG vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ferguson plc (FERG) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERG achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FERG has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 18.82%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 41.18% annualized return.


FERG

1D
-0.45%
1M
6.26%
YTD
7.82%
6M
4.50%
1Y
12.04%
3Y*
18.29%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
18.82%

TSLA

1D
1.14%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
-9.93%
6M
-17.12%
1Y
25.73%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
41.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FERG vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FERG
Ferguson plc
7.82%29.90%-8.62%55.10%-27.17%56.42%33.97%49.90%-14.35%23.91%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-9.93%11.36%62.52%101.72%-65.03%49.76%743.44%25.70%6.89%45.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FERG and TSLA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010

0.14

The correlation between FERG and TSLA shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FERG:

$46.22B

TSLA:

$1.43T

EPS

FERG:

$10.54

TSLA:

$1.10

PE Ratio

FERG:

22.51

TSLA:

368.94

PEG Ratio

FERG:

2.03

TSLA:

45.14

PS Ratio

FERG:

1.47

TSLA:

14.61

PB Ratio

FERG:

7.87

TSLA:

17.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

FERG:

$31.63B

TSLA:

$97.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FERG:

$9.72B

TSLA:

$18.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

FERG:

$2.75B

TSLA:

$10.48B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FERG vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERG
FERG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FERG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FERG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FERG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FERG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FERG Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLA
TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FERG vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferguson plc (FERG) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FERGTSLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.12

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.86

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.56

1.94

-0.38

FERG vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERG Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is comparable to the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERG and TSLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FERG vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERG drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERG and TSLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FERGTSLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-73.63%

+18.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-29.93%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.92%

-53.77%

+20.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.31%

-73.63%

+30.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.35%

-73.63%

+18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.03%

-17.32%

+6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.82%

-22.71%

+12.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

13.29%

-5.56%

Volatility

FERG vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ferguson plc (FERG) is 9.85%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 13.06%. This indicates that FERG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FERGTSLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.85%

13.06%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.61%

27.98%

-6.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.56%

44.37%

-14.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.23%

59.01%

-28.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.50%

59.08%

-27.58%

Dividends

FERG vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

FERG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FERG
Ferguson plc
1.48%1.12%1.84%1.57%2.76%2.34%2.33%2.43%3.75%3.52%1.11%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FERG vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferguson plc and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
7.47B
22.39B
(FERG) Total Revenue
(TSLA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FERG vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ferguson plc and Tesla, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
31.0%
21.1%
Portfolio components
FERG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 7.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

TSLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

FERG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 612.00M and revenue of 7.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

TSLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

FERG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 414.00M and revenue of 7.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

TSLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FERG and TSLA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLA has higher volatility (13.06%) compared to FERG (9.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FERG dropped -55.35% vs TSLA's -73.63%.

TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FERG and TSLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer