Correlation
The correlation between AHT.L and RMS.PA is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA
Compare and contrast key facts about Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AHT.L or RMS.PA.
Performance
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AHT.L:
-0.54
RMS.PA:
0.18
AHT.L:
-0.53
RMS.PA:
0.37
AHT.L:
0.93
RMS.PA:
1.05
AHT.L:
-0.39
RMS.PA:
0.13
AHT.L:
-0.79
RMS.PA:
0.34
AHT.L:
21.06%
RMS.PA:
9.65%
AHT.L:
31.72%
RMS.PA:
27.44%
AHT.L:
-98.94%
RMS.PA:
-47.65%
AHT.L:
-30.56%
RMS.PA:
-19.66%
Fundamentals
AHT.L:
£18.99B
RMS.PA:
€236.61B
AHT.L:
£2.58
RMS.PA:
€43.79
AHT.L:
17.02
RMS.PA:
51.54
AHT.L:
1.28
RMS.PA:
5.20
AHT.L:
1.79
RMS.PA:
15.98
AHT.L:
3.36
RMS.PA:
13.47
AHT.L:
£10.79B
RMS.PA:
€15.17B
AHT.L:
£9.50B
RMS.PA:
€10.66B
AHT.L:
£3.86B
RMS.PA:
€6.93B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AHT.L achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly lower than RMS.PA's -1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AHT.L has underperformed RMS.PA with an annualized return of 16.22%, while RMS.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 21.20% annualized return.
AHT.L
-10.49%
4.77%
-11.65%
-16.54%
11.26%
11.60%
16.22%
RMS.PA
-1.78%
-4.89%
-1.01%
5.54%
32.31%
26.00%
21.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AHT.L
RMS.PA
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA - Dividend Comparison
AHT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than RMS.PA's 1.15% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AHT.L Ashtead Group plc | 2.19% | 1.62% | 1.45% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.18% | 1.66% | 2.02% | 1.38% | 1.42% | 1.36% | 1.00% |
RMS.PA Hermès International Société en commandite par actions | 1.15% | 1.08% | 0.68% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.52% | 0.68% | 1.34% | 0.84% | 0.86% | 2.09% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AHT.L drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than RMS.PA's maximum drawdown of -47.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AHT.L and RMS.PA.
Loading data...
Volatility
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA - Volatility Comparison
Ashtead Group plc (AHT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Hermès International Société en commandite par actions (RMS.PA) at 5.46%. This indicates that AHT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMS.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
AHT.L vs. RMS.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ashtead Group plc and Hermès International Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities