PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FERG vs. GWW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FERGGWW
YTD Return7.85%46.97%
1Y Return30.29%54.24%
3Y Return (Ann)11.13%36.71%
5Y Return (Ann)26.35%32.05%
10Y Return (Ann)32.69%19.30%
Sharpe Ratio1.172.47
Sortino Ratio1.643.47
Omega Ratio1.221.45
Calmar Ratio1.853.72
Martin Ratio4.189.28
Ulcer Index7.35%5.79%
Daily Std Dev26.35%21.74%
Max Drawdown-55.35%-56.74%
Current Drawdown-7.34%-1.03%

Fundamentals


FERGGWW
Market Cap$41.89B$59.46B
EPS$8.54$36.91
PE Ratio24.4433.08
PEG Ratio1.852.98
Total Revenue (TTM)$21.93B$16.93B
Gross Profit (TTM)$6.64B$6.65B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.18B$2.73B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between FERG and GWW is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FERG vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FERG achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 46.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FERG has outperformed GWW with an annualized return of 32.69%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively lower 19.30% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.18%
27.61%
FERG
GWW

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FERG vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferguson plc (FERG) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FERG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FERG, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.17
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FERG, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.64
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FERG, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FERG, currently valued at 1.85, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.85
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FERG, currently valued at 4.18, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.18
GWW
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GWW, currently valued at 2.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GWW, currently valued at 3.47, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.47
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GWW, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GWW, currently valued at 3.72, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.003.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GWW, currently valued at 9.28, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.009.28

FERG vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FERG Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERG and GWW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.17
2.47
FERG
GWW

Dividends

FERG vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

FERG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, more than GWW's 0.66% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FERG
Ferguson plc
1.54%1.57%2.76%2.34%2.33%2.27%9.77%1.99%2.15%2.77%2.59%5.04%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.66%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%1.64%1.41%

Drawdowns

FERG vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERG drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, roughly equal to the maximum GWW drawdown of -56.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERG and GWW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-7.34%
-1.03%
FERG
GWW

Volatility

FERG vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ferguson plc (FERG) is 6.94%, while W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that FERG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.94%
8.19%
FERG
GWW

Financials

FERG vs. GWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferguson plc and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items