PortfoliosLab logo
FERG vs. GWW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FERG and GWW is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FERG vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ferguson plc (FERG) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FERG:

-0.30

GWW:

0.92

Sortino Ratio

FERG:

-0.22

GWW:

1.22

Omega Ratio

FERG:

0.97

GWW:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

FERG:

-0.29

GWW:

0.68

Martin Ratio

FERG:

-0.59

GWW:

1.59

Ulcer Index

FERG:

16.22%

GWW:

10.50%

Daily Std Dev

FERG:

32.24%

GWW:

22.78%

Max Drawdown

FERG:

-55.35%

GWW:

-56.74%

Current Drawdown

FERG:

-17.37%

GWW:

-10.55%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FERG:

$36.74B

GWW:

$52.16B

EPS

FERG:

$8.17

GWW:

$39.09

PE Ratio

FERG:

22.41

GWW:

27.78

PEG Ratio

FERG:

1.43

GWW:

2.39

PS Ratio

FERG:

1.23

GWW:

3.03

PB Ratio

FERG:

6.69

GWW:

14.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

FERG:

$22.59B

GWW:

$17.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FERG:

$6.84B

GWW:

$6.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

FERG:

$2.16B

GWW:

$2.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FERG achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than GWW's 3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, FERG has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 14.43%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.


FERG

YTD

5.59%

1M

7.47%

6M

-14.72%

1Y

-9.58%

3Y*

17.59%

5Y*

21.08%

10Y*

14.43%

GWW

YTD

3.61%

1M

6.41%

6M

-9.40%

1Y

20.81%

3Y*

31.95%

5Y*

30.09%

10Y*

18.15%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ferguson plc

W.W. Grainger, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FERG vs. GWW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FERG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FERG is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FERG is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FERG is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FERG is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FERG is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FERG is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GWW is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GWW is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GWW is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GWW is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GWW is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GWW is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FERG vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ferguson plc (FERG) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FERG Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FERG and GWW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FERG vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

FERG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than GWW's 0.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FERG
Ferguson plc
1.78%1.84%1.57%2.76%2.34%2.33%2.27%9.77%1.99%2.15%2.77%2.59%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.77%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%1.64%

Drawdowns

FERG vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FERG drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, roughly equal to the maximum GWW drawdown of -56.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERG and GWW.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FERG vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

Ferguson plc (FERG) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 5.93%. This indicates that FERG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FERG vs. GWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ferguson plc and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
6.87B
4.31B
(FERG) Total Revenue
(GWW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FERG vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ferguson plc and W.W. Grainger, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
29.7%
39.7%
(FERG) Gross Margin
(GWW) Gross Margin
FERG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.04B and revenue of 6.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.7%.

GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.71B and revenue of 4.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.7%.

FERG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 410.00M and revenue of 6.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 672.00M and revenue of 4.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

FERG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 276.00M and revenue of 6.87B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 479.00M and revenue of 4.31B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.