FERCX vs. FSEAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX).
FERCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 15, 1999. FSEAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 19, 1993.
Performance
FERCX vs. FSEAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FERCX vs. FSEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.65% | 35.65% | 19.76% | 12.64% | -31.29% | -15.75% | 71.24% | 29.64% | -15.72% | 45.46% |
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 0.63% | 36.43% | 21.80% | 13.58% | -31.26% | -14.91% | 73.43% | 30.97% | -15.08% | 45.13% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FERCX having a 0.65% return and FSEAX slightly lower at 0.63%. Over the past 10 years, FERCX has underperformed FSEAX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while FSEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.43% annualized return.
FERCX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 32.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.57%
FSEAX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 33.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FERCX vs. FSEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FERCX has a 1.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FSEAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FERCX vs. FSEAX — Risk / Return Rank
FERCX
FSEAX
FERCX vs. FSEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FERCX | FSEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.62 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.15 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.23 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 8.05 | -0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FERCX | FSEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.62 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.10 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.60 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.39 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between FERCX and FSEAX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FERCX vs. FSEAX - Dividend Comparison
FERCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERCX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.89% | 7.03% | 5.13% | 6.53% | 0.03% | 0.56% | 0.92% |
FSEAX Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 14.14% | 14.10% | 6.15% | 3.44% | 0.05% | 1.26% | 0.44% |
Drawdowns
FERCX vs. FSEAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FERCX drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum FSEAX drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FERCX and FSEAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FERCX | FSEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -65.59% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -13.42% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.94% | -53.64% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.44% | -58.07% | -0.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.62% | -13.42% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -24.80% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.76% | 3.71% | +0.05% |
Volatility
FERCX vs. FSEAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class C (FERCX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) have volatilities of 9.62% and 9.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FERCX | FSEAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.62% | 9.42% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.64% | 14.42% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 20.22% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 22.52% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 20.75% | -0.04% |