FSEAX vs. FERIX

In the year-to-date period, FSEAX achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than FERIX's 2.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FSEAX has underperformed FERIX with an annualized return of 3.21%, while FERIX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.12% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FSEAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FERIX's 0.94% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the FERIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEAX and FERIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FSEAX nor FERIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FSEAX drawdown since its inception was -65.12%, roughly equal to the maximum FERIX drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEAX and FERIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class I (FERIX) have volatilities of 11.52% and 11.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.