DFRSX vs. ETGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX).
DFRSX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Jan 4, 1993. ETGIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 1, 1994.
Performance
DFRSX vs. ETGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFRSX vs. ETGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company | -4.61% | 34.73% | 0.27% | 3.99% | -16.96% | 12.59% | 14.24% | 13.30% | -15.48% | 25.17% |
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | -17.93% | -2.06% | 17.55% | 20.60% | -19.86% | 25.74% | 17.64% | 10.52% | -12.14% | 44.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFRSX achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly higher than ETGIX's -17.93% return. Over the past 10 years, DFRSX has underperformed ETGIX with an annualized return of 6.02%, while ETGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.25% annualized return.
DFRSX
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -12.55%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 27.45%
- 3Y*
- 9.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
ETGIX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -13.94%
- YTD
- -17.93%
- 6M
- -15.49%
- 1Y
- -14.36%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 7.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFRSX vs. ETGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFRSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than ETGIX's 1.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFRSX vs. ETGIX — Risk / Return Rank
DFRSX
ETGIX
DFRSX vs. ETGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFRSX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | -1.01 | +2.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | -1.35 | +3.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.84 | +0.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | -0.67 | +2.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | -2.19 | +8.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFRSX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | -1.01 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.15 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.41 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.25 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFRSX and ETGIX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DFRSX vs. ETGIX - Dividend Comparison
DFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than ETGIX's 17.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFRSX DFA Asia Pacific Small Company | 5.15% | 4.92% | 4.66% | 4.70% | 9.99% | 12.82% | 2.91% | 4.56% | 3.48% | 4.01% | 3.79% | 3.96% |
ETGIX Eaton Vance Greater India Fund | 17.63% | 14.47% | 4.07% | 4.85% | 21.62% | 8.60% | 0.24% | 2.79% | 1.17% | 3.32% | 0.56% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
DFRSX vs. ETGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFRSX drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, smaller than the maximum ETGIX drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRSX and ETGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFRSX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.06% | -73.62% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -22.03% | +7.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.18% | -29.84% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.25% | -42.71% | -3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -27.22% | +13.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.28% | -26.89% | +9.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 6.71% | -2.74% |
Volatility
DFRSX vs. ETGIX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Eaton Vance Greater India Fund (ETGIX) at 5.74%. This indicates that DFRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFRSX | ETGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 5.74% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 9.79% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 14.21% | +4.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 15.01% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 17.55% | -0.57% |