PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DFRSX vs. FSEAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DFRSX and FSEAX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

DFRSX vs. FSEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.44%
7.52%
DFRSX
FSEAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DFRSX:

0.36

FSEAX:

1.32

Sortino Ratio

DFRSX:

0.61

FSEAX:

1.96

Omega Ratio

DFRSX:

1.07

FSEAX:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

DFRSX:

0.18

FSEAX:

0.45

Martin Ratio

DFRSX:

1.25

FSEAX:

5.55

Ulcer Index

DFRSX:

4.43%

FSEAX:

4.24%

Daily Std Dev

DFRSX:

15.18%

FSEAX:

17.82%

Max Drawdown

DFRSX:

-71.01%

FSEAX:

-65.12%

Current Drawdown

DFRSX:

-26.07%

FSEAX:

-40.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFRSX achieves a 0.78% return, which is significantly higher than FSEAX's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, DFRSX has underperformed FSEAX with an annualized return of 2.24%, while FSEAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.19% annualized return.


DFRSX

YTD

0.78%

1M

-1.35%

6M

-1.05%

1Y

7.13%

5Y*

-0.97%

10Y*

2.24%

FSEAX

YTD

-1.81%

1M

-4.90%

6M

6.32%

1Y

26.20%

5Y*

-0.07%

10Y*

4.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFRSX vs. FSEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFRSX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than FSEAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


FSEAX
Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSEAX: current value at 1.02% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.02%
Expense ratio chart for DFRSX: current value at 0.42% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.42%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DFRSX vs. FSEAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFRSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFRSX is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFRSX is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFRSX is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFRSX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFRSX is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFRSX is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FSEAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSEAX is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSEAX is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSEAX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSEAX is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSEAX is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSEAX is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DFRSX vs. FSEAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DFRSX, currently valued at 0.36, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.361.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for DFRSX, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.611.96
The chart of Omega ratio for DFRSX, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.071.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for DFRSX, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.180.45
The chart of Martin ratio for DFRSX, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.255.55
DFRSX
FSEAX

The current DFRSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the FSEAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFRSX and FSEAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.36
1.32
DFRSX
FSEAX

Dividends

DFRSX vs. FSEAX - Dividend Comparison

DFRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, while FSEAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
4.63%4.66%4.70%4.24%4.60%2.91%4.56%3.49%4.01%3.80%3.96%5.24%
FSEAX
Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.00%0.17%0.00%0.72%1.06%0.82%1.09%0.88%1.80%

Drawdowns

DFRSX vs. FSEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFRSX drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, which is greater than FSEAX's maximum drawdown of -65.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFRSX and FSEAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-26.07%
-40.28%
DFRSX
FSEAX

Volatility

DFRSX vs. FSEAX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) and Fidelity Emerging Asia Fund (FSEAX) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
4.45%
4.40%
DFRSX
FSEAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab