FEMG vs. ONEQ
FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. FEMG is actively managed, while ONEQ is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.
Performance
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMG
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ONEQ
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 16.16%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- 1Y
- 39.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 19.68%
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 4.23% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMG and ONEQ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2026 | 0.62 |
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEMG
ONEQ
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Industrials
FEMG
ONEQ
Technology
FEMG
ONEQ
Consumer Cyclical
FEMG
ONEQ
Healthcare
FEMG
ONEQ
Financial Services
FEMG
ONEQ
Energy
FEMG
ONEQ
Utilities
FEMG
ONEQ
Communication Services
FEMG
ONEQ
Real Estate
FEMG
ONEQ
Consumer Defensive
FEMG
ONEQ
Basic Materials
FEMG
ONEQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMG vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank
FEMG
ONEQ
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMG | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.78 | 0.65 | +4.13 |
Drawdowns
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -3.29%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and ONEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMG | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.29% | -55.09% | +51.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -0.85% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -7.95% | +6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.19% | — |
Volatility
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMG | ONEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.29% | 16.05% | -3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 22.14% | -9.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 21.71% | -9.42% |
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FEMG vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison
FEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ONEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | 0.67% | 0.54% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.71% | 2.51% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.12% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMG and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FEMG.
ONEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for FEMG.
FEMG is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 0.21% for ONEQ.
Find the right allocation for FEMG and ONEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer