FEMG vs. FFOX
FEMG (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF) and FFOX (FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEMG charges 0.23%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FFOX.
Performance
FEMG vs. FFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FEMG
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFOX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEMG vs. FFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 3.75% |
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 3.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMG and FFOX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEMG vs. FFOX — Risk / Return Rank
FEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FFOX
FEMG vs. FFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF (FEMG) and FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEMG | FFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEMG vs. FFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMG drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, smaller than the maximum FFOX drawdown of -12.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMG and FFOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMG | FFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -12.41% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -0.44% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -2.22% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility
FEMG vs. FFOX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEMG | FFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.54% | 17.64% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 17.49% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 17.49% | -0.95% |
FEMG vs. FFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMG has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FFOX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEMG vs. FFOX - Dividend Comparison
FEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FFOX's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FEMG Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Growth ETF | 0.10% | 0.00% |
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 1.69% | 1.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEMG and FFOX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FEMG is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FEMG is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for FFOX.
FFOX has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.10% for FEMG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and FundX. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for FEMG and 1.02% for FFOX.
Find the right allocation for FEMG and FFOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer