FEMB vs. XEMD
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD).
FEMB and XEMD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEMB is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 4, 2014. XEMD is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022.
Performance
FEMB vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FEMB vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | -2.12% | 21.77% | -5.61% | 17.12% | 1.41% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | -0.51% | 13.98% | 8.77% | 10.26% | 1.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a -2.12% return, which is significantly lower than XEMD's -0.51% return.
FEMB
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 13.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.14%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
XEMD
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 10.87%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMB vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FEMB vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank
FEMB
XEMD
FEMB vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEMB | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 1.88 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.07 | 2.64 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 3.10 | -1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 13.23 | -5.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEMB | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 1.88 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 1.31 | -1.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between FEMB and XEMD is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FEMB vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison
FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%, less than XEMD's 6.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.00% | 5.67% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% |
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF | 6.10% | 6.15% | 6.30% | 6.19% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FEMB vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and XEMD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEMB | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.44% | -10.01% | -20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -3.52% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.52% | -2.72% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.03% | -1.29% | -8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 0.82% | +0.99% |
Volatility
FEMB vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 2.43%. This indicates that FEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FEMB | XEMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 2.43% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 3.40% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 5.81% | +3.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.21% | 6.94% | +3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 6.94% | +4.28% |