PortfoliosLab logo
FEMB vs. BWZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FEMB and BWZ is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FEMB vs. BWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FEMB:

0.54

BWZ:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

FEMB:

0.87

BWZ:

1.42

Omega Ratio

FEMB:

1.10

BWZ:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

FEMB:

0.34

BWZ:

0.24

Martin Ratio

FEMB:

1.08

BWZ:

1.81

Ulcer Index

FEMB:

4.90%

BWZ:

4.02%

Daily Std Dev

FEMB:

9.75%

BWZ:

8.01%

Max Drawdown

FEMB:

-30.44%

BWZ:

-34.23%

Current Drawdown

FEMB:

-6.63%

BWZ:

-23.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than BWZ's 8.92% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMB has outperformed BWZ with an annualized return of 0.71%, while BWZ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.37% annualized return.


FEMB

YTD

10.01%

1M

3.49%

6M

6.50%

1Y

5.22%

3Y*

5.93%

5Y*

1.62%

10Y*

0.71%

BWZ

YTD

8.92%

1M

-0.11%

6M

6.97%

1Y

7.16%

3Y*

1.40%

5Y*

-0.57%

10Y*

-0.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEMB vs. BWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BWZ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FEMB vs. BWZ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEMB is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEMB is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEMB is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEMB is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEMB is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEMB is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

BWZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BWZ is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BWZ is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BWZ is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BWZ is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BWZ is 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BWZ is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FEMB vs. BWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FEMB Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the BWZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMB and BWZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FEMB vs. BWZ - Dividend Comparison

FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than BWZ's 2.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FEMB
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
5.75%6.09%5.15%6.35%6.12%5.29%5.40%5.86%6.38%5.83%4.89%0.62%
BWZ
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF
2.25%2.47%1.63%0.44%0.60%0.13%0.43%1.10%0.40%0.13%0.06%0.19%

Drawdowns

FEMB vs. BWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, smaller than the maximum BWZ drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and BWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FEMB vs. BWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) is 2.24%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term International Treasury Bond ETF (BWZ) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that FEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...