FEMB vs. EMB
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB).
FEMB and EMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FEMB is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 4, 2014. EMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FEMB or EMB.
Correlation
The correlation between FEMB and EMB is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FEMB vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FEMB:
0.20
EMB:
1.00
FEMB:
0.36
EMB:
1.44
FEMB:
1.04
EMB:
1.18
FEMB:
0.11
EMB:
0.49
FEMB:
0.36
EMB:
4.49
FEMB:
4.85%
EMB:
1.51%
FEMB:
9.02%
EMB:
6.75%
FEMB:
-30.44%
EMB:
-34.70%
FEMB:
-9.85%
EMB:
-5.39%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEMB achieves a 6.22% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMB has underperformed EMB with an annualized return of 0.69%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.
FEMB
6.22%
1.58%
-1.85%
1.66%
3.09%
0.69%
EMB
2.34%
-1.11%
-0.24%
6.54%
3.50%
2.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FEMB vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEMB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FEMB vs. EMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FEMB
EMB
FEMB vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FEMB vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
FEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than EMB's 5.53% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMB First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF | 5.89% | 6.09% | 5.15% | 6.35% | 6.12% | 5.29% | 5.40% | 5.86% | 6.38% | 5.83% | 4.89% | 0.62% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.53% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% | 4.56% |
Drawdowns
FEMB vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEMB drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMB and EMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FEMB vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF (FEMB) has a higher volatility of 2.16% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 1.40%. This indicates that FEMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.