FEM vs. PIE
FEM (First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEM returned 9.71%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for PIE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
FEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEM achieves a 16.06% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FEM has underperformed PIE with an annualized return of 9.71%, while PIE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.
FEM
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 6M
- 15.66%
- 1Y
- 34.10%
- 3Y*
- 18.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
PIE
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 39.08%
- 6M
- 35.11%
- 1Y
- 61.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 6.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
FEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEM First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund | 16.06% | 28.36% | 3.01% | 10.84% | -14.24% | 7.40% | -1.68% | 20.55% | -15.51% | 41.05% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 39.08% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 21.23% | 26.11% | -22.04% | 41.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEM and PIE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.84 |
The correlation between FEM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEM
PIE
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
FEM
PIE
Industrials
FEM
PIE
Energy
FEM
PIE
Basic Materials
FEM
PIE
Financial Services
FEM
PIE
Utilities
FEM
PIE
Consumer Cyclical
FEM
PIE
Communication Services
FEM
PIE
Consumer Defensive
FEM
PIE
Healthcare
FEM
PIE
Real Estate
FEM
PIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
FEM
PIE
FEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.46 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 6.25 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.40 | 19.24 | -6.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEM drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -72.98% | +26.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -9.87% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.79% | -28.69% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -40.32% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.23% | -40.32% | -5.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.00% | -4.85% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.00% | -26.00% | +11.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.20% | -0.44% |
Volatility
FEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) is 8.27%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that FEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 12.33% | -4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | 21.24% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 24.19% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 20.85% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 21.56% | -0.60% |
FEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
FEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than PIE's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEM First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund | 3.30% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 4.96% | 6.15% | 4.15% | 2.68% | 3.31% | 3.52% | 2.45% | 2.25% | 3.61% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.74% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to FEM (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEM dropped -46.23% vs PIE's -72.98%.
On 10-year performance, PIE leads with 10.61% vs 9.71% for FEM. On fees, FEM is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PIE has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEM is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
FEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 1.74% for PIE.
FEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. FEM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM and 0.90% for PIE.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEM and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer