FEM vs. SPEM
FEM (First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund) and SPEM (SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - FEM tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index while SPEM tracks the S&P Emerging BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FEM returned 10.00%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for SPEM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPEM.
Performance
FEM vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEM achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 14.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEM having a 10.00% annualized return and SPEM not far behind at 9.96%.
FEM
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 20.82%
- 1Y
- 42.19%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
SPEM
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 14.64%
- 6M
- 15.36%
- 1Y
- 33.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
FEM vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEM First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund | 20.65% | 28.36% | 3.01% | 10.84% | -14.24% | 7.40% | -1.68% | 20.55% | -15.51% | 41.05% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 14.64% | 25.63% | 11.40% | 10.51% | -17.90% | 1.51% | 14.55% | 19.69% | -13.26% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEM and SPEM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FEM and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FEM vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FEM
SPEM
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
FEM
SPEM
Industrials
FEM
SPEM
Energy
FEM
SPEM
Basic Materials
FEM
SPEM
Financial Services
FEM
SPEM
Utilities
FEM
SPEM
Consumer Cyclical
FEM
SPEM
Communication Services
FEM
SPEM
Consumer Defensive
FEM
SPEM
Healthcare
FEM
SPEM
Real Estate
FEM
SPEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEM vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank
FEM
SPEM
FEM vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FEM | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.56 | 2.93 | +1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.81 | 10.51 | +5.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FEM vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEM drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM and SPEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEM | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -64.41% | +18.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.31% | -11.36% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.79% | -17.62% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.72% | -31.75% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.23% | -36.06% | -10.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | 0.00% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.01% | -14.72% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 3.16% | -0.48% |
Volatility
FEM vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 6.73%. This indicates that FEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEM | SPEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 6.73% | +1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.85% | 14.43% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.54% | 16.77% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 17.30% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.01% | 18.84% | +2.17% |
FEM vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEM vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison
FEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than SPEM's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEM First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund | 2.58% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 4.96% | 6.15% | 4.15% | 2.68% | 3.31% | 3.52% | 2.45% | 2.25% | 3.61% |
SPEM SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF | 3.44% | 2.77% | 2.78% | 2.80% | 3.38% | 3.14% | 1.92% | 2.94% | 2.34% | 1.12% | 1.51% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FEM and SPEM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FEM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to SPEM (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEM dropped -46.23% vs SPEM's -64.41%.
On 10-year performance, FEM leads with 10.00% vs 9.96% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FEM has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.
SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.58% for FEM.
FEM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM and 0.07% for SPEM.
FEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEM and SPEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer