PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEM vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEM vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEM achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPEM's 14.64% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FEM having a 10.00% annualized return and SPEM not far behind at 9.96%.


FEM

1D
1.04%
1M
1.06%
YTD
20.65%
6M
20.82%
1Y
42.19%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
10.00%

SPEM

1D
1.10%
1M
4.42%
YTD
14.64%
6M
15.36%
1Y
33.19%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
9.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEM vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
20.65%28.36%3.01%10.84%-14.24%7.40%-1.68%20.55%-15.51%41.05%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
14.64%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FEM and SPEM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.89

The correlation between FEM and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

FEM vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FEM
SPEM

Technology

28.4%
32.1%

Industrials

19.8%
8.3%

Energy

12.9%
4.2%

Basic Materials

7.8%
8.0%

Financial Services

6.4%
19.2%

Utilities

6.1%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.6%

Communication Services

4.6%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
3.6%

Healthcare

2.8%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.8%

Technology

FEM
28.4%
SPEM
32.1%

Industrials

FEM
19.8%
SPEM
8.3%

Energy

FEM
12.9%
SPEM
4.2%

Basic Materials

FEM
7.8%
SPEM
8.0%

Financial Services

FEM
6.4%
SPEM
19.2%

Utilities

FEM
6.1%
SPEM
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FEM
5.7%
SPEM
9.6%

Communication Services

FEM
4.6%
SPEM
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

FEM
2.9%
SPEM
3.6%

Healthcare

FEM
2.8%
SPEM
3.7%

Real Estate

FEM
2.6%
SPEM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEM vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEM
FEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEM vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEMSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

2.93

+1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.81

10.51

+5.29

FEM vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEM and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEM vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEM drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEM and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEMSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-64.41%

+18.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.31%

-11.36%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.79%

-17.62%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-31.75%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

-36.06%

-10.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.28%

0.00%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.01%

-14.72%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

3.16%

-0.48%

Volatility

FEM vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund (FEM) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) at 6.73%. This indicates that FEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEMSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.89%

6.73%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.85%

14.43%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.54%

16.77%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.60%

17.30%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.01%

18.84%

+2.17%

FEM vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEM's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEM vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

FEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than SPEM's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEM
First Trust Emerging Markets AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%3.13%3.66%4.96%6.15%4.15%2.68%3.31%3.52%2.45%2.25%3.61%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
3.44%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FEM and SPEM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEM has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to SPEM (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEM dropped -46.23% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, FEM leads with 10.00% vs 9.96% for SPEM. On fees, SPEM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FEM has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPEM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEM.

SPEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.58% for FEM.

FEM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX EM Index, while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FEM and 0.07% for SPEM.

FEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEM and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer