FELG vs. VUG
FELG (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FELG is actively managed, while VUG is passively managed. Over the past year, FELG returned 27.58% vs 27.84% for VUG. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FELG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
FELG vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELG achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than VUG's 9.49% return.
FELG
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- 1Y
- 27.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 27.84%
- 3Y*
- 25.93%
- 5Y*
- 15.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
FELG vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 7.70% | 18.44% | 35.45% | 4.20% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.49% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 4.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELG and VUG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FELG and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
FELG vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FELG
VUG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FELG
VUG
Communication Services
FELG
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
FELG
VUG
Industrials
FELG
VUG
Healthcare
FELG
VUG
Financial Services
FELG
VUG
Energy
FELG
VUG
Consumer Defensive
FELG
VUG
Basic Materials
FELG
VUG
Utilities
FELG
VUG
Real Estate
FELG
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELG vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
FELG
VUG
FELG vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.69 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.86 | 5.92 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.77 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.62 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
FELG vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELG drawdown since its inception was -23.89%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELG and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.89% | -50.68% | +26.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -16.53% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.51% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -7.09% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 4.71% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FELG vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is 3.50%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that FELG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELG | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 3.83% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 12.11% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.46% | 15.84% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 22.22% | -2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 21.44% | -1.55% |
FELG vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FELG vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
FELG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.44% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FELG and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VUG has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to FELG (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELG dropped -23.89% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 1-year performance, VUG leads with 27.84% vs 27.58% for FELG. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FELG has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VUG has performed better with a 27.84% return vs 27.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for FELG.
VUG has the higher dividend yield at 0.37%, compared with 0.34% for FELG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELG and 0.03% for VUG.
FELG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELG and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer