FELC vs. CCOR
FELC (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FELC returned 28.58% vs -5.97% for CCOR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. FELC charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.
Performance
FELC vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FELC achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -3.71% return.
FELC
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 28.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CCOR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.87%
- 1Y
- -5.97%
- 3Y*
- -2.34%
- 5Y*
- -2.56%
- 10Y*
- —
FELC vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 11.23% | 17.09% | 25.25% | 5.68% |
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | -3.71% | 3.52% | -5.70% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FELC and CCOR is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between FELC and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.10 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FELC vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FELC
CCOR
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FELC
CCOR
Communication Services
FELC
CCOR
Financial Services
FELC
CCOR
Consumer Cyclical
FELC
CCOR
Industrials
FELC
CCOR
Healthcare
FELC
CCOR
Energy
FELC
CCOR
Consumer Defensive
FELC
CCOR
Basic Materials
FELC
CCOR
Utilities
FELC
CCOR
Real Estate
FELC
CCOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FELC vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank
FELC
CCOR
FELC vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FELC | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.87 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | -0.69 | +3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.66 | -1.59 | +16.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FELC | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | -0.87 | +3.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.11 | +1.48 |
Drawdowns
FELC vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FELC drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FELC and CCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FELC | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.59% | -22.99% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -8.75% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -20.03% | +19.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.91% | -7.29% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.77% | -1.82% |
Volatility
FELC vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 1.78%. This indicates that FELC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FELC | CCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 1.78% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.93% | 4.96% | +3.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.90% | 6.93% | +4.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 11.10% | +4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 10.75% | +4.42% |
FELC vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FELC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FELC vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison
FELC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than CCOR's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOR Core Alternative ETF | 1.11% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.02% | 1.50% | 0.73% | 1.53% | 0.89% |
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF | 0.85% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FELC and CCOR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FELC has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to CCOR (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FELC dropped -18.59% vs CCOR's -22.99%.
On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 28.58% vs -5.97% for CCOR. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 28.58% return vs -5.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.
CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.85% for FELC.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FELC and 1.09% for CCOR.
FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FELC and CCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer