FEAC vs. TRND
FEAC (Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF) and TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FEAC is actively managed, while TRND is passively managed. Over the past year, FEAC returned 32.02% vs 22.41% for TRND. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FEAC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for TRND.
Performance
FEAC vs. TRND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 13.02% return, which is significantly higher than TRND's 10.59% return.
FEAC
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 13.02%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 32.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRND
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- —
FEAC vs. TRND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 13.02% | 18.01% | -1.69% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 10.59% | 6.03% | -1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FEAC and TRND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FEAC and TRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FEAC vs. TRND — Risk / Return Rank
FEAC
TRND
FEAC vs. TRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FEAC | TRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.01 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.49 | 2.84 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.36 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.97 | 2.86 | +1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.41 | 12.02 | +5.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FEAC | TRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.01 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.66 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
FEAC vs. TRND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than TRND's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and TRND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FEAC | TRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.96% | -17.88% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -8.00% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -5.22% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.90% | -0.04% |
Volatility
FEAC vs. TRND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) is 3.07%, while Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that FEAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FEAC | TRND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.59% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.15% | 8.96% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 11.22% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 9.71% | +7.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 11.18% | +6.33% |
FEAC vs. TRND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TRND's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
FEAC vs. TRND - Dividend Comparison
FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than TRND's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEAC Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.10% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, FEAC and TRND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TRND has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FEAC (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs TRND's -17.88%.
On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 32.02% vs 22.41% for TRND. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FEAC has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 32.02% return vs 22.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.85% for FEAC.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.77% for TRND.
FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FEAC and TRND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer