PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FEAC vs. TRND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FEAC vs. TRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEAC achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly higher than TRND's 8.51% return.


FEAC

1D
-1.46%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
9.92%
6M
8.83%
1Y
26.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRND

1D
-1.73%
1M
0.37%
YTD
8.51%
6M
7.65%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FEAC vs. TRND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
9.92%18.01%-1.87%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
8.51%6.03%-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FEAC and TRND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024

0.89

The correlation between FEAC and TRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FEAC vs. TRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TRND
TRND Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FEAC vs. TRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FEACTRNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

2.44

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.64

10.01

+3.63

FEAC vs. TRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FEAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the TRND Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEAC and TRND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FEAC vs. TRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEAC drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than TRND's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEAC and TRND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FEACTRNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-17.88%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-8.00%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-1.97%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-5.19%

+2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.95%

-0.01%

Volatility

FEAC vs. TRND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) at 5.06%. This indicates that FEAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FEACTRNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.35%

5.06%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.21%

9.95%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.30%

12.10%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

9.92%

+7.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

11.28%

+6.36%

FEAC vs. TRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEAC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TRND's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FEAC vs. TRND - Dividend Comparison

FEAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than TRND's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
0.79%0.94%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
2.14%2.32%2.31%2.51%1.76%0.93%0.60%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FEAC and TRND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FEAC has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to TRND (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FEAC dropped -18.96% vs TRND's -17.88%.

On 1-year performance, FEAC leads with 26.41% vs 19.47% for TRND. On fees, FEAC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TRND has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FEAC has performed better with a 26.41% return vs 19.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEAC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.79% for FEAC.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FEAC and 0.77% for TRND.

FEAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FEAC and TRND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer