FDV vs. SCHV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FDV is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.

Performance

FDV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FDV

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -0.18%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHV

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 3.45%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 6M: 16.13%
• 1Y: 28.72%
• 3Y*: 19.00%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	0.36%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FDV and SCHV is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026	-0.05

FDV vs. SCHV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDV	SCHV
Financial Services	15.7%	18.6%
Utilities	15.1%	4.2%
Healthcare	12.8%	10.9%
Consumer Defensive	12.3%	8.3%
Technology	10.7%	22.5%
Real Estate	9.7%	3.9%
Energy	9.3%	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	6.6%
Industrials	3.1%	13.6%
Communication Services	2.0%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.7%

Return for Risk

FDV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 83
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDV	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.65	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.46	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.22	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.95	—

Drawdowns

FDV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -3.33%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDV	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.33%	-37.08%	+33.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-1.20%	-0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.13%	-3.82%	+2.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDV	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.45%	11.14%	+1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.45%	14.55%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.45%	16.94%	-4.49%

FDV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SCHV's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.74%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDV and SCHV in my portfolio?

FDV and SCHV have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDV or SCHV?

On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDV or SCHV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDV or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.27% for FDV.

What is the main difference between FDV and SCHV?

They also come from different issuers: Federated and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.04% for SCHV.