FDV vs. HDV
FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. FDV is actively managed, while HDV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FDV returned 14.78%/yr vs 14.94%/yr for HDV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
FDV vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDV achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.69% return.
FDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 19.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
FDV vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 11.72% | 11.01% | 14.41% | -2.16% | 1.92% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDV and HDV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FDV and HDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
FDV vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDV
HDV
Utilities
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
FDV
HDV
Financial Services
FDV
HDV
Healthcare
FDV
HDV
Consumer Defensive
FDV
HDV
Technology
FDV
HDV
Energy
FDV
HDV
Real Estate
FDV
HDV
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDV
HDV
Industrials
FDV
HDV
Communication Services
FDV
HDV
Basic Materials
FDV
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDV vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
FDV
HDV
FDV vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.95 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 11.02 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.10 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.72 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
FDV vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDV drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDV and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.70% | -37.04% | +20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.70% | -5.18% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.55% | -10.49% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -2.54% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -3.09% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 1.85% | -0.06% |
Volatility
FDV vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV) is 2.82%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that FDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDV | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 3.19% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 7.56% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 9.73% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 12.82% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 15.73% | -3.08% |
FDV vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDV vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
FDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.56% | 3.11% | 3.12% | 3.54% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDV and HDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to FDV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDV dropped -16.70% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 3-year performance, HDV leads with 14.94% vs 14.78% for FDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HDV has performed better with a 14.94% return vs 14.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FDV.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.56% for FDV.
FDV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HDV is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Federated and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FDV and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDV and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer