PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDUS vs. CLSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDUS vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDUS achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 24.77% return.


FDUS

1D
1.95%
1M
1.56%
YTD
0.93%
6M
3.89%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
13.95%

CLSE

1D
-1.02%
1M
3.46%
YTD
24.77%
6M
23.28%
1Y
48.27%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDUS vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
0.93%2.08%20.55%20.02%13.19%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
24.77%20.44%35.54%17.54%-4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FDUS and CLSE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDUS vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDUS
FDUS Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDUS vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDUSCLSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.62

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

10.00

-9.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.58

36.36

-35.79

FDUS vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDUS and CLSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDUS vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDUS drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDUS and CLSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDUSCLSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.76%

-16.45%

-52.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.45%

-4.85%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-16.45%

-7.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-1.02%

-6.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-3.56%

-5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.71%

1.33%

+6.38%

Volatility

FDUS vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 4.22%. This indicates that FDUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDUSCLSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

4.22%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.78%

10.55%

+7.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.31%

13.65%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.00%

13.92%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.57%

13.92%

+19.65%

Dividends

FDUS vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

FDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.08%, more than CLSE's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.76%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
12.08%11.14%11.51%14.63%10.51%8.90%10.15%10.78%13.69%10.54%10.17%11.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDUS and CLSE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDUS has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to CLSE (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDUS dropped -68.76% vs CLSE's -16.45%.

CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.56 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDUS and CLSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer