PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDUS vs. BME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FDUS vs. BME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDUS achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than BME's 10.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FDUS has outperformed BME with an annualized return of 14.32%, while BME has yielded a comparatively lower 8.88% annualized return.


FDUS

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.12%
6M
8.99%
YTD
8.93%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
14.32%
ALL TIME*
13.41%

BME

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.25%
6M
7.95%
YTD
10.59%
1Y
32.41%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
8.88%
ALL TIME*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.10M$1.96M$1.99M
$4.84M$8.39M$6.57M

FDUS vs. BME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
8.93%2.08%20.55%20.02%17.09%50.66%-0.78%40.72%-13.70%6.25%
BME
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust
10.59%17.87%-0.08%-1.08%-4.62%7.25%18.64%24.04%6.38%23.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FDUS and BME is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FDUS:

$749.22M

BME:

$562.07M

EPS

FDUS:

$2.37

BME:

$7.77

PE Ratio

FDUS:

8.33

BME:

5.60

PEG Ratio

FDUS:

3.33

BME:

0.14

PS Ratio

FDUS:

5.19

BME:

8.92

PB Ratio

FDUS:

1.01

BME:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

FDUS:

$140.24M

BME:

$63.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FDUS:

$91.57M

BME:

$53.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

FDUS:

$98.79M

BME:

$104.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDUS vs. BME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDUS
FDUS Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BME
BME Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BME Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BME Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BME Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDUS vs. BME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDUSBMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.45

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.95

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

9.00

-7.89

FDUS vs. BME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the BME Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDUS and BME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDUS vs. BME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDUS drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than BME's maximum drawdown of -42.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDUS and BME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDUSBMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.76%

-42.03%

-26.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.16%

-11.03%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.94%

-14.38%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-18.26%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.76%

-36.65%

-32.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-1.25%

-3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-6.25%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

3.62%

+2.89%

Volatility

FDUS vs. BME - Volatility Comparison

Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to BlackRock Health Sciences Trust (BME) at 3.74%. This indicates that FDUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDUSBMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.09%

3.74%

+6.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.45%

10.49%

+8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.20%

13.11%

+10.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.39%

15.22%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.71%

19.82%

+13.89%

Dividends

FDUS vs. BME - Dividend Comparison

FDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than BME's 7.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BME
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust
7.23%7.65%6.87%6.32%5.87%5.03%5.04%5.65%6.58%6.58%9.45%17.04%
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
11.20%11.14%11.51%14.63%10.51%8.90%10.15%10.78%13.69%10.54%10.17%11.69%

Financials

FDUS vs. BME - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidus Investment Corporation and BlackRock Health Sciences Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FDUS and BME have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDUS has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to BME (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDUS dropped -68.76% vs BME's -42.03%.

BME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDUS and BME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer