PortfoliosLab logo
FDUS vs. HRZN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FDUS and HRZN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FDUS vs. HRZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDUS:

0.73

HRZN:

-0.88

Sortino Ratio

FDUS:

1.04

HRZN:

-1.00

Omega Ratio

FDUS:

1.15

HRZN:

0.83

Calmar Ratio

FDUS:

0.55

HRZN:

-0.60

Martin Ratio

FDUS:

1.94

HRZN:

-1.43

Ulcer Index

FDUS:

6.86%

HRZN:

18.37%

Daily Std Dev

FDUS:

19.58%

HRZN:

30.01%

Max Drawdown

FDUS:

-69.51%

HRZN:

-60.44%

Current Drawdown

FDUS:

-12.09%

HRZN:

-40.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FDUS:

$699.54M

HRZN:

$297.01M

EPS

FDUS:

$2.33

HRZN:

-$0.95

PEG Ratio

FDUS:

3.59

HRZN:

2.07

PS Ratio

FDUS:

4.73

HRZN:

3.02

PB Ratio

FDUS:

1.05

HRZN:

0.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

FDUS:

$141.82M

HRZN:

$66.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FDUS:

$111.50M

HRZN:

$59.77M

EBITDA (TTM)

FDUS:

$54.95M

HRZN:

$14.03M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDUS achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly higher than HRZN's -11.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FDUS has outperformed HRZN with an annualized return of 13.58%, while HRZN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.29% annualized return.


FDUS

YTD

-2.26%

1M

8.27%

6M

1.87%

1Y

14.27%

3Y*

14.84%

5Y*

30.73%

10Y*

13.58%

HRZN

YTD

-11.85%

1M

-9.26%

6M

-13.02%

1Y

-26.37%

3Y*

-3.84%

5Y*

3.44%

10Y*

4.29%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidus Investment Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDUS vs. HRZN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDUS is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDUS is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDUS is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDUS is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDUS is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDUS is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

HRZN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRZN is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRZN is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRZN is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRZN is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRZN is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRZN is 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDUS vs. HRZN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FDUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the HRZN Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDUS and HRZN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FDUS vs. HRZN - Dividend Comparison

FDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.54%, less than HRZN's 17.74% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FDUS
Fidus Investment Corporation
11.54%11.51%14.63%10.51%8.90%10.15%8.17%13.69%10.54%10.17%11.66%11.51%
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation
17.74%14.68%10.02%10.43%7.54%9.44%9.28%10.67%10.70%12.96%11.76%9.86%

Drawdowns

FDUS vs. HRZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDUS drawdown since its inception was -69.51%, which is greater than HRZN's maximum drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDUS and HRZN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FDUS vs. HRZN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) is 6.19%, while Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a volatility of 20.21%. This indicates that FDUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FDUS vs. HRZN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidus Investment Corporation and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20212022202320242025
30.32M
24.52M
(FDUS) Total Revenue
(HRZN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items