FDUS vs. HRZN
FDUS (Fidus Investment Corporation) and HRZN (Horizon Technology Finance Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FDUS returned 13.73%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for HRZN. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FDUS vs. HRZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDUS achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly higher than HRZN's -22.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FDUS has outperformed HRZN with an annualized return of 13.73%, while HRZN has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.
FDUS
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 1.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
HRZN
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 16.35%
- YTD
- -22.06%
- 6M
- -21.21%
- 1Y
- -24.65%
- 3Y*
- -14.96%
- 5Y*
- -13.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
FDUS vs. HRZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDUS Fidus Investment Corporation | -1.00% | 2.08% | 20.55% | 20.02% | 17.09% | 50.66% | -0.78% | 40.72% | -13.70% | 6.25% |
HRZN Horizon Technology Finance Corporation | -22.06% | -14.44% | -22.87% | 26.99% | -19.72% | 29.74% | 14.08% | 26.88% | 11.71% | 18.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDUS and HRZN is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.34 |
The correlation between FDUS and HRZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FDUS:
$680.90M
HRZN:
$196.84M
FDUS:
$2.40
HRZN:
$0.63
FDUS:
7.48
HRZN:
6.56
FDUS:
2.99
HRZN:
0.13
FDUS:
4.66
HRZN:
3.46
FDUS:
0.92
HRZN:
0.59
FDUS:
$140.24M
HRZN:
$53.12M
FDUS:
$91.57M
HRZN:
$47.15M
FDUS:
$98.79M
HRZN:
$51.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDUS vs. HRZN — Risk / Return Rank
FDUS
HRZN
FDUS vs. HRZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDUS | HRZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.92 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | -0.53 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.14 | -0.94 | +1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDUS vs. HRZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDUS drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than HRZN's maximum drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDUS and HRZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDUS | HRZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -62.57% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.45% | -46.88% | +30.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.94% | -59.36% | +35.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | -62.57% | +38.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.76% | -62.57% | -6.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -54.23% | +45.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -13.41% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | 26.24% | -18.54% |
Volatility
FDUS vs. HRZN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) is 5.96%, while Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) has a volatility of 18.30%. This indicates that FDUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDUS | HRZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 18.30% | -12.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | 41.25% | -23.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.27% | 43.82% | -22.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 31.88% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.57% | 36.68% | -3.11% |
Dividends
FDUS vs. HRZN - Dividend Comparison
FDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.32%, less than HRZN's 37.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDUS Fidus Investment Corporation | 12.32% | 11.14% | 11.51% | 14.63% | 10.51% | 8.90% | 10.15% | 10.78% | 13.69% | 10.54% | 10.17% | 11.69% |
HRZN Horizon Technology Finance Corporation | 37.03% | 20.47% | 15.24% | 10.40% | 10.86% | 7.85% | 9.44% | 9.28% | 10.67% | 10.70% | 12.96% | 11.76% |
Financials
FDUS vs. HRZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fidus Investment Corporation and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FDUS vs. HRZN - Profitability Comparison
FDUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidus Investment Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 34.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HRZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 24.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FDUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidus Investment Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 34.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
HRZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 24.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
FDUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fidus Investment Corporation reported a net income of 24.64M and revenue of 34.29M, resulting in a net margin of 71.9%.
HRZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation reported a net income of 9.24M and revenue of 24.08M, resulting in a net margin of 38.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDUS and HRZN have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HRZN has higher volatility (18.30%) compared to FDUS (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDUS dropped -68.76% vs HRZN's -62.57%.
FDUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDUS and HRZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer