FDTTX vs. GQHPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX).
FDTTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 30, 1999. GQHPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.
Performance
FDTTX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FDTTX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | -2.04% | 27.28% | 26.68% | 23.86% | -8.28% | 4.44% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 11.80% | 7.53% | 12.69% | 3.94% | 6.73% | 10.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDTTX achieves a -2.04% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 11.80% return.
FDTTX
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- 1Y
- 27.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 14.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.73%
GQHPX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 6M
- 11.28%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FDTTX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FDTTX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank
FDTTX
GQHPX
FDTTX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDTTX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.49 | 0.93 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.28 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.18 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 1.37 | +0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 4.50 | +5.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDTTX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 0.93 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.90 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between FDTTX and GQHPX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FDTTX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison
FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.99%, more than GQHPX's 2.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDTTX Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A | 10.99% | 10.77% | 9.20% | 4.34% | 5.64% | 5.60% | 4.40% | 7.49% | 16.04% | 5.52% | 2.74% | 5.82% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 2.66% | 2.98% | 3.14% | 2.64% | 3.24% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FDTTX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and GQHPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDTTX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -17.26% | -40.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -8.17% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -2.15% | -4.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -3.36% | -7.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.64% | +0.09% |
Volatility
FDTTX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) at 2.66%. This indicates that FDTTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FDTTX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 2.66% | +3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 6.98% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.64% | 11.90% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 12.67% | +4.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 12.67% | +6.18% |