PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTTX vs. FGTAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDTTX having a 9.09% return and FGTAX slightly higher at 9.10%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDTTX having a 16.04% annualized return and FGTAX not far ahead at 16.60%.


FDTTX

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.50%
YTD
9.09%
6M
8.43%
1Y
28.25%
3Y*
25.34%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
16.04%

FGTAX

1D
-0.77%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
9.10%
6M
8.57%
1Y
27.66%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
16.07%
10Y*
16.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
9.09%27.28%26.68%23.86%-8.28%24.97%8.84%30.98%-9.36%16.36%
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
9.10%26.58%25.62%26.18%-9.26%25.98%12.59%30.74%-7.68%17.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTTX and FGTAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2008

0.96

The correlation between FDTTX and FGTAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTTX vs. FGTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTTX
FDTTX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FDTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FGTAX
FGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTTXFGTAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.18

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

14.10

-0.32

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the FGTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTTX and FGTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTTX drawdown since its inception was -58.00%, which is greater than FGTAX's maximum drawdown of -53.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTTX and FGTAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTTXFGTAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.00%

-53.07%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

-9.04%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.03%

-18.52%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.88%

-23.48%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

-35.21%

-1.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.44%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.13%

-6.76%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

2.04%

+0.10%

Volatility

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A (FDTTX) and Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) have volatilities of 4.40% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTTXFGTAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

4.35%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.04%

9.68%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.93%

12.55%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

16.74%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

18.15%

+0.72%

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTTX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FGTAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTTX vs. FGTAX - Dividend Comparison

FDTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.87%, more than FGTAX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTTX
Fidelity Advisor Capital Development Fund Class A
9.87%10.77%9.20%4.34%5.64%5.60%4.40%7.49%16.04%5.52%2.74%5.82%
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
3.41%3.72%2.48%1.86%4.17%4.61%7.84%12.91%21.65%16.21%1.75%3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FDTTX and FGTAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDTTX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to FGTAX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTTX dropped -58.00% vs FGTAX's -53.07%.

FGTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTTX and FGTAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer