PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTS vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTS vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 14.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDTS having a 10.96% annualized return and VEA not far behind at 10.72%.


FDTS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
18.78%
6M
20.77%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
10.78%
10Y*
10.96%

VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
3.58%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTS vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
18.78%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTS and VEA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012

0.55

Over the past year, FDTS and VEA have become more correlated (0.86) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FDTS vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDTS
VEA

Industrials

22.2%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

18.9%
7.5%

Technology

14.1%
13.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
23.3%

Basic Materials

11.3%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.6%

Real Estate

4.3%
2.7%

Energy

4.0%
5.4%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.4%

Healthcare

2.8%
8.2%

Utilities

2.7%
3.3%

Industrials

FDTS
22.2%
VEA
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FDTS
18.9%
VEA
7.5%

Technology

FDTS
14.1%
VEA
13.8%

Financial Services

FDTS
11.9%
VEA
23.3%

Basic Materials

FDTS
11.3%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FDTS
4.7%
VEA
5.6%

Real Estate

FDTS
4.3%
VEA
2.7%

Energy

FDTS
4.0%
VEA
5.4%

Communication Services

FDTS
3.2%
VEA
3.4%

Healthcare

FDTS
2.8%
VEA
8.2%

Utilities

FDTS
2.7%
VEA
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTS vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTS vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDTSVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

2.58

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

9.92

+1.86

FDTS vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTS and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDTS vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-60.68%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-11.63%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-13.45%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-29.71%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-35.73%

-15.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-1.06%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-13.28%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

3.02%

+0.64%

Volatility

FDTS vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.84%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

6.84%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

14.38%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.27%

16.58%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

16.72%

+12.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.92%

17.40%

+7.52%

FDTS vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTS vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.53%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTS and VEA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to VEA (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, FDTS leads with 10.96% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.53% for FDTS.

FDTS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.03% for VEA.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTS and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer