PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDTS vs. SCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDTS vs. SCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDTS achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than SCZ's 9.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FDTS has outperformed SCZ with an annualized return of 10.50%, while SCZ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.03% annualized return.


FDTS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
19.06%
1Y
45.71%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.50%

SCZ

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.13%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDTS vs. SCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
16.64%51.17%2.44%10.96%-15.34%11.79%12.90%18.71%-23.71%36.01%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.56%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FDTS and SCZ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012

0.57

Over the past year, FDTS and SCZ have become more correlated (0.86) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.

FDTS vs. SCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDTS
SCZ

Industrials

23.0%
24.6%

Consumer Cyclical

18.4%
11.8%

Technology

13.4%
9.1%

Financial Services

11.7%
12.5%

Basic Materials

11.2%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.0%

Real Estate

4.3%
10.3%

Energy

4.3%
3.7%

Healthcare

3.0%
5.5%

Communication Services

3.0%
4.1%

Utilities

2.7%
2.8%

Industrials

FDTS
23.0%
SCZ
24.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDTS
18.4%
SCZ
11.8%

Technology

FDTS
13.4%
SCZ
9.1%

Financial Services

FDTS
11.7%
SCZ
12.5%

Basic Materials

FDTS
11.2%
SCZ
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

FDTS
5.0%
SCZ
5.0%

Real Estate

FDTS
4.3%
SCZ
10.3%

Energy

FDTS
4.3%
SCZ
3.7%

Healthcare

FDTS
3.0%
SCZ
5.5%

Communication Services

FDTS
3.0%
SCZ
4.1%

Utilities

FDTS
2.7%
SCZ
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDTS vs. SCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDTS vs. SCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTSSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

2.11

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.32

8.08

+5.25

FDTS vs. SCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the SCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDTS and SCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTSSCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.67

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.30

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.46

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.27

+0.10

Drawdowns

FDTS vs. SCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDTS drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, smaller than the maximum SCZ drawdown of -61.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDTS and SCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTSSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.26%

-61.86%

+10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-11.43%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

-15.06%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

-36.87%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

-41.07%

-10.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.49%

-1.79%

-4.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-13.06%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.98%

+0.46%

Volatility

FDTS vs. SCZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) at 4.57%. This indicates that FDTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDTSSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

4.57%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

11.95%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.05%

14.47%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

16.74%

+12.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.85%

17.43%

+7.42%

FDTS vs. SCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDTS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SCZ's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDTS vs. SCZ - Dividend Comparison

FDTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than SCZ's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.01%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDTS and SCZ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to SCZ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDTS dropped -51.26% vs SCZ's -61.86%.

On 10-year performance, FDTS leads with 10.50% vs 8.03% for SCZ. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

SCZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 2.58% for FDTS.

FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index, while SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDTS and 0.40% for SCZ.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDTS and SCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer