FDT vs. SILJ
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDT returned 11.17%/yr vs 8.82%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
FDT vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's -1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FDT has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 11.17%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.82% annualized return.
FDT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
SILJ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 84.73%
- 3Y*
- 45.21%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
FDT vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 23.23% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 34.42% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -1.77% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and SILJ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, FDT and SILJ have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
FDT vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FDT
SILJ
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
FDT
SILJ
-
Consumer Cyclical
FDT
SILJ
-
Financial Services
FDT
SILJ
Basic Materials
FDT
SILJ
Energy
FDT
SILJ
-
Technology
FDT
SILJ
-
Real Estate
FDT
SILJ
-
Utilities
FDT
SILJ
-
Consumer Defensive
FDT
SILJ
Communication Services
FDT
SILJ
Healthcare
FDT
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
SILJ
FDT vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDT | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.26 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.19 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.01 | 5.65 | +8.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDT vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -79.04% | +32.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -39.16% | +25.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -39.16% | +24.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | -53.55% | +20.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | -70.06% | +23.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -32.56% | +29.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -41.40% | +30.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.54% | 15.17% | -11.63% |
Volatility
FDT vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) is 8.93%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 20.76%. This indicates that FDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 20.76% | -11.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.27% | 47.36% | -30.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.59% | 56.54% | -36.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 44.76% | -26.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 46.41% | -27.79% |
FDT vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDT vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than SILJ's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.89% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.04% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDT and SILJ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (20.76%) compared to FDT (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 11.17% vs 8.82% for SILJ. On fees, SILJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FDT has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 8.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SILJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 2.04% for SILJ.
FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SILJ is Silver. FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.69% for SILJ.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer