PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDT vs. NVOH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FDT vs. NVOH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FDT vs. NVOH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than NVOH's -24.75% return.


FDT

1D
1.73%
1M
-7.63%
YTD
11.73%
6M
18.75%
1Y
57.05%
3Y*
25.20%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
9.91%

NVOH

1D
-1.00%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-24.75%
6M
-34.28%
1Y
-46.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FDT vs. NVOH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NVOH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FDT vs. NVOH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NVOH
NVOH Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVOH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVOH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVOH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVOH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVOH Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDT vs. NVOH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDTNVOHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.96

-0.88

+3.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.59

-1.14

+4.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

0.84

+0.72

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

-0.89

+5.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.64

-1.51

+19.15

FDT vs. NVOH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDT Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the NVOH Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDT and NVOH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDTNVOHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

-0.88

+3.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

-0.98

+1.34

Correlation

The correlation between FDT and NVOH is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FDT vs. NVOH - Dividend Comparison

FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than NVOH's 4.56% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
3.19%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
NVOH
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF
4.56%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDT vs. NVOH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum NVOH drawdown of -61.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and NVOH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FDTNVOHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.10%

-61.60%

+15.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-53.00%

+39.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.75%

-60.40%

+51.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-36.02%

+25.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

31.21%

-27.94%

Volatility

FDT vs. NVOH - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) at 8.19%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVOH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FDTNVOHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

8.19%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.05%

37.53%

-23.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.39%

52.51%

-33.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

51.04%

-33.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

51.04%

-32.71%