FDT vs. GVAL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. FDT is passively managed, while GVAL is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FDT returned 10.91%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for GVAL. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.

Performance

FDT vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 25.50% return, which is significantly higher than GVAL's 14.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDT having a 10.91% annualized return and GVAL not far behind at 10.76%.

FDT

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 25.50%
• 6M: 28.63%
• 1Y: 55.05%
• 3Y*: 30.08%
• 5Y*: 12.55%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

GVAL

• 1D: -1.24%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 14.37%
• 6M: 15.35%
• 1Y: 39.69%
• 3Y*: 26.42%
• 5Y*: 13.14%
• 10Y*: 10.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDT vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	25.50%	52.21%	6.97%	15.03%	-19.51%	11.43%	4.29%	16.82%	-19.98%	34.42%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	14.37%	55.87%	2.59%	13.30%	-7.98%	10.70%	-8.51%	17.24%	-14.30%	29.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FDT and GVAL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2014	0.77

The correlation between FDT and GVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDT vs. GVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDT	GVAL
Industrials	34.0%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	11.5%	2.6%
Financial Services	10.2%	16.4%
Basic Materials	9.6%	8.2%
Energy	9.2%	7.8%
Technology	8.1%	6.4%
Real Estate	5.3%	7.0%
Utilities	5.2%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	1.9%
Communication Services	2.7%	4.6%
Healthcare	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

FDT vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDT

FDT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 81

GVAL

GVAL Risk / Return Rank: 77
GVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
GVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
GVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 81
GVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
GVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDT vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDT	GVAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.75	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	3.64	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.49	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	3.47	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.12	13.33	+2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDT vs. GVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDT Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the GVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDT and GVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDT	GVAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	2.75	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.72	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.56	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.35	+0.05

Drawdowns

FDT vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, roughly equal to the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and GVAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDT	GVAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.10%	-46.82%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.41%	-11.50%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.29%	-15.72%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.18%	-30.83%	-2.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.10%	-46.82%	+0.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.24%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.78%	-13.88%	+3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.99%	+0.44%

Volatility

FDT vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) at 5.10%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDT	GVAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.23%	5.10%	+2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.91%	12.72%	+3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.42%	14.52%	+3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	18.46%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.52%	19.21%	-0.69%

FDT vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDT vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison

FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, which matches GVAL's 2.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund	2.84%	3.27%	3.89%	4.36%	2.29%	3.80%	2.42%	2.78%	2.13%	1.57%	1.76%	1.83%
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF	2.83%	2.93%	4.75%	6.12%	5.05%	2.97%	1.90%	2.84%	4.65%	2.00%	2.54%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDT and GVAL in my portfolio?

FDT and GVAL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDT or GVAL?

FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to GVAL (5.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs GVAL's -46.82%.

Which ETF is better, FDT or GVAL?

On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 10.91% vs 10.76% for GVAL. On fees, GVAL is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, GVAL has been the lower-risk option at 5.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDT or GVAL?

Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 10.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDT or GVAL?

GVAL is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDT or GVAL?

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.83% for GVAL.

What is the main difference between FDT and GVAL?

FDT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GVAL is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.64% for GVAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.