FDT vs. ABLG
FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) and ABLG (Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FDT is passively managed, while ABLG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FDT returned 12.55%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for ABLG. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for ABLG.
Performance
FDT vs. ABLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDT achieves a 25.50% return, which is significantly higher than ABLG's 4.01% return.
FDT
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 25.50%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 55.05%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
ABLG
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 4.01%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 9.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FDT vs. ABLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 25.50% | 52.21% | 6.97% | 15.03% | -19.51% | 11.43% | 4.29% | 16.82% | -19.98% | 13.46% |
ABLG Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF | 4.01% | 13.27% | 0.39% | 18.22% | -24.37% | 16.87% | 18.30% | 24.52% | -17.73% | 7.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDT and ABLG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between FDT and ABLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDT vs. ABLG — Risk / Return Rank
FDT
ABLG
FDT vs. ABLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) and Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDT | ABLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.11 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 0.71 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.12 | 2.53 | +13.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDT | ABLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 0.54 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.11 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.29 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
FDT vs. ABLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDT drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, which is greater than ABLG's maximum drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDT and ABLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDT | ABLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -34.17% | -11.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -13.00% | -0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.29% | -21.34% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.18% | -34.13% | +0.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -1.32% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -9.21% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 3.66% | -0.23% |
Volatility
FDT vs. ABLG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) at 6.15%. This indicates that FDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDT | ABLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 6.15% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.91% | 14.17% | +1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.42% | 17.02% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 16.92% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 18.89% | -0.37% |
FDT vs. ABLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLG's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDT vs. ABLG - Dividend Comparison
FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than ABLG's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABLG Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF | 2.45% | 2.30% | 2.13% | 2.39% | 9.36% | 2.01% | 0.64% | 1.90% | 0.92% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.84% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDT and ABLG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to ABLG (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDT dropped -46.10% vs ABLG's -34.17%.
On 5-year performance, FDT leads with 12.55% vs 1.80% for ABLG. On fees, ABLG is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, ABLG has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDT has performed better with a 12.55% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ABLG is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.45% for ABLG.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Abacus. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FDT and 0.54% for ABLG.
FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDT and ABLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer