PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABLG vs. ABLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABLG vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABLG vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ABLG
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
-6.13%13.27%0.39%18.22%-24.37%3.58%
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
9.02%6.64%7.05%18.89%7.42%3.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLG achieves a -6.13% return, which is significantly lower than ABLD's 9.02% return.


ABLG

1D
3.11%
1M
-9.71%
YTD
-6.13%
6M
-3.33%
1Y
6.83%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*

ABLD

1D
2.85%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
9.02%
6M
10.21%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABLG vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLG has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than ABLD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABLG vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLG
ABLG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ABLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLG Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ABLD
ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLG vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABLGABLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

0.80

-0.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

1.18

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.17

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

1.03

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.80

4.19

-2.39

ABLG vs. ABLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the ABLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLG and ABLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABLGABLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

0.80

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.71

-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between ABLG and ABLD is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ABLG vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison

ABLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than ABLD's 4.18% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABLG
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
2.71%2.30%2.13%2.39%9.36%2.01%0.64%1.90%0.92%0.26%
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
4.18%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ABLG vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLG drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than ABLD's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLG and ABLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLGABLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.17%

-19.35%

-14.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.24%

-14.67%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-6.95%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.33%

-3.91%

-5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

3.61%

-0.02%

Volatility

ABLG vs. ABLD - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) at 7.45%. This indicates that ABLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABLGABLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

7.45%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

11.80%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.57%

18.51%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

17.58%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

17.58%

+1.23%