PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABLG vs. JIVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABLG vs. JIVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLG achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than JIVE's 16.94% return.


ABLG

1D
1.19%
1M
3.16%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.07%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*

JIVE

1D
0.84%
1M
4.08%
YTD
16.94%
6M
21.63%
1Y
43.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLG vs. JIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ABLG
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
4.52%13.27%0.39%7.35%
JIVE
Jpmorgan International Value ETF
16.94%49.80%11.22%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLG and JIVE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.79

The correlation between ABLG and JIVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABLG vs. JIVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLG
ABLG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ABLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

JIVE
JIVE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
JIVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIVE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JIVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIVE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLG vs. JIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABLGJIVEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.56

3.04

-2.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

3.99

-3.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.54

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.28

-3.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.81

16.61

-13.80

ABLG vs. JIVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the JIVE Sharpe Ratio of 3.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLG and JIVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABLGJIVEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

3.04

-2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

2.04

-1.75

Drawdowns

ABLG vs. JIVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLG drawdown since its inception was -34.17%, which is greater than JIVE's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLG and JIVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLGJIVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.17%

-13.79%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.00%

-10.57%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

0.00%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-1.96%

-7.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

2.72%

+0.94%

Volatility

ABLG vs. JIVE - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF (ABLG) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) at 4.94%. This indicates that ABLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABLGJIVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

4.94%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.17%

11.93%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

14.45%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

14.96%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.90%

14.96%

+3.94%

ABLG vs. JIVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLG has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than JIVE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABLG vs. JIVE - Dividend Comparison

ABLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, less than JIVE's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABLG
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
2.43%2.30%2.13%2.39%9.36%2.01%0.64%1.90%0.92%0.26%
JIVE
Jpmorgan International Value ETF
2.46%2.88%2.48%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABLG and JIVE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABLG has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to JIVE (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLG dropped -34.17% vs JIVE's -13.79%.

On 1-year performance, JIVE leads with 43.55% vs 9.41% for ABLG. On fees, ABLG is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, JIVE has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JIVE has performed better with a 43.55% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABLG is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JIVE.

JIVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 2.43% for ABLG.

They also come from different issuers: Abacus and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for ABLG and 0.55% for JIVE.

JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABLG and JIVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer