FDS vs. BIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDS (FactSet Research Systems Inc.) is a stock, while BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Over the past 10 years, FDS returned 5.91%/yr vs 2.18%/yr for BIL. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

FDS vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDS achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly lower than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FDS has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 5.91%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.

FDS

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 13.47%
• YTD: -11.79%
• 6M: -8.30%
• 1Y: -40.68%
• 3Y*: -13.01%
• 5Y*: -3.88%
• 10Y*: 5.91%

BIL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.41%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDS vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc.	-11.79%	-38.88%	1.62%	19.99%	-16.75%	47.49%	25.13%	35.51%	5.02%	19.44%
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	1.49%	4.15%	5.19%	4.94%	1.40%	-0.10%	0.40%	2.03%	1.74%	0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FDS and BIL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007	-0.02

Return for Risk

FDS vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDS

FDS Risk / Return Rank: 10
FDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FDS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FDS Martin Ratio Rank: 18

BIL

BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDS vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDS	BIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	19.71	-20.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.39	174.16	-175.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	87.91	-87.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	355.35	-356.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	2,817.77	-2,818.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDS vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDS Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDS and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDS	BIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.00	19.71	-20.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.14	13.16	-13.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	8.52	-8.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.78	-2.33

Drawdowns

FDS vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDS drawdown since its inception was -61.13%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDS and BIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDS	BIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.13%	-0.78%	-60.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.50%	-0.01%	-57.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.13%	-0.01%	-61.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.13%	-0.10%	-61.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.13%	-0.21%	-60.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.65%	0.00%	-47.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.20%	-0.26%	-12.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.76%	0.00%	+37.76%

Volatility

FDS vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that FDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDS	BIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.31%	0.05%	+18.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.34%	0.13%	+35.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.12%	0.20%	+40.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.65%	0.26%	+27.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.63%	0.26%	+27.37%

Dividends

FDS vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

FDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIL SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF	3.86%	4.13%	5.03%	4.92%	1.35%	0.00%	0.30%	2.05%	1.66%	0.68%	0.07%	0.00%
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc.	1.76%	1.50%	0.85%	0.80%	0.87%	0.66%	0.91%	1.04%	1.24%	1.13%	1.19%	1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDS and BIL in my portfolio?

FDS and BIL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDS or BIL?

FDS has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDS dropped -61.13% vs BIL's -0.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.