PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FDS vs. J
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FDSJ
YTD Return3.63%38.95%
1Y Return7.84%31.60%
3Y Return (Ann)3.35%8.09%
5Y Return (Ann)15.12%14.66%
10Y Return (Ann)14.87%15.01%
Sharpe Ratio0.441.62
Sortino Ratio0.712.05
Omega Ratio1.101.31
Calmar Ratio0.492.15
Martin Ratio0.946.14
Ulcer Index9.80%5.65%
Daily Std Dev20.98%21.45%
Max Drawdown-58.96%-74.14%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Fundamentals


FDSJ
Market Cap$18.40B$18.28B
EPS$13.93$5.08
PE Ratio34.7628.96
PEG Ratio2.671.38
Total Revenue (TTM)$2.20B$12.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.19B$2.57B
EBITDA (TTM)$867.01M$1.08B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between FDS and J is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FDS vs. J - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FDS achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly lower than J's 38.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDS having a 14.87% annualized return and J not far ahead at 15.01%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.77%
30.66%
FDS
J

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDS vs. J - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.44
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FDS, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.94
J
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for J, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.62
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for J, currently valued at 2.05, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.05
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for J, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for J, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.15
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for J, currently valued at 6.14, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.14

FDS vs. J - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the J Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDS and J, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.44
1.62
FDS
J

Dividends

FDS vs. J - Dividend Comparison

FDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than J's 0.71% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
0.82%0.80%0.87%0.66%0.91%1.04%1.24%1.13%1.19%1.05%1.08%1.25%
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
0.71%0.88%0.84%0.63%0.73%0.91%1.18%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDS vs. J - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDS drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, smaller than the maximum J drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDS and J. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember00
FDS
J

Volatility

FDS vs. J - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) is 4.39%, while Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that FDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than J based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.39%
6.02%
FDS
J

Financials

FDS vs. J - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items