PortfoliosLab logo
FDS vs. J
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FDS and J is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FDS vs. J - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDS:

0.64

J:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

FDS:

0.71

J:

0.81

Omega Ratio

FDS:

1.08

J:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

FDS:

0.45

J:

0.47

Martin Ratio

FDS:

1.25

J:

1.15

Ulcer Index

FDS:

6.85%

J:

10.51%

Daily Std Dev

FDS:

22.21%

J:

24.33%

Max Drawdown

FDS:

-58.96%

J:

-74.14%

Current Drawdown

FDS:

-6.93%

J:

-14.10%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FDS:

$17.67B

J:

$15.22B

EPS

FDS:

$14.25

J:

$3.01

PE Ratio

FDS:

32.67

J:

41.87

PEG Ratio

FDS:

2.31

J:

1.90

PS Ratio

FDS:

7.84

J:

1.30

PB Ratio

FDS:

8.49

J:

3.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

FDS:

$2.25B

J:

$8.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FDS:

$1.22B

J:

$2.54B

EBITDA (TTM)

FDS:

$891.51M

J:

$906.71M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDS having a -4.14% return and J slightly higher at -4.06%. Over the past 10 years, FDS has underperformed J with an annualized return of 11.80%, while J has yielded a comparatively higher 14.16% annualized return.


FDS

YTD

-4.14%

1M

6.28%

6M

-6.17%

1Y

14.08%

3Y*

7.24%

5Y*

9.29%

10Y*

11.80%

J

YTD

-4.06%

1M

3.30%

6M

-9.23%

1Y

12.16%

3Y*

3.79%

5Y*

13.59%

10Y*

14.16%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FactSet Research Systems Inc.

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDS vs. J — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDS is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDS is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDS is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDS is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDS is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

J
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of J is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of J is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of J is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of J is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of J is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of J is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDS vs. J - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the J Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDS and J, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FDS vs. J - Dividend Comparison

FDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than J's 0.92% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
1.15%0.85%0.80%0.87%0.66%0.91%1.04%1.24%1.13%1.19%1.05%1.08%
J
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
0.92%0.76%0.81%0.77%0.60%0.70%0.76%1.03%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FDS vs. J - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDS drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, smaller than the maximum J drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDS and J.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FDS vs. J - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) is 5.28%, while Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) has a volatility of 9.01%. This indicates that FDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than J based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FDS vs. J - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
570.66M
2.91B
(FDS) Total Revenue
(J) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FDS vs. J - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
52.8%
25.4%
(FDS) Gross Margin
(J) Gross Margin
FDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a gross profit of 301.06M and revenue of 570.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.

J - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 738.35M and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

FDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported an operating income of 185.49M and revenue of 570.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

J - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of 208.65M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

FDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a net income of 144.86M and revenue of 570.66M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.

J - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of 5.61M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.