FDS vs. J

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J).

Performance

FDS vs. J - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FDS vs. J - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc.	-24.84%	-38.88%	1.62%	19.99%	-16.75%	47.49%	25.13%	35.51%	5.02%	19.44%
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.	-3.66%	2.13%	24.23%	9.02%	-13.12%	28.60%	22.36%	54.99%	-10.58%	16.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FDS : $8.10B J : $15.15B
EPS FDS : $15.51 J : $3.64
PE Ratio FDS : 13.99 J : 35.01
PEG Ratio FDS : 1.31 J : 6.30
PS Ratio FDS : 3.42 J : 1.23
PB Ratio FDS : 3.81 J : 4.40
Total Revenue (TTM) FDS : $2.40B J : $12.39B
Gross Profit (TTM) FDS : $1.25B J : $3.03B
EBITDA (TTM) FDS : $821.05M J : $1.08B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDS achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than J's -3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FDS has underperformed J with an annualized return of 4.68%, while J has yielded a comparatively higher 14.42% annualized return.

FDS

• 1D: 6.08%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: -24.84%
• 6M: -23.57%
• 1Y: -51.58%
• 3Y*: -18.55%
• 5Y*: -6.37%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

J

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -7.67%
• YTD: -3.66%
• 6M: -14.64%
• 1Y: 8.48%
• 3Y*: 10.76%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 14.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FDS vs. J — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDS

FDS Risk / Return Rank: 5
FDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FDS Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
FDS Martin Ratio Rank: 11

J

J Risk / Return Rank: 49
J Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
J Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
J Omega Ratio Rank: 46
J Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
J Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDS vs. J - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDS	J	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.41	0.28	-1.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.16	0.57	-2.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.71	1.08	-0.37
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	0.35	-1.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.49	0.76	-2.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FDS vs. J - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDS Sharpe Ratio is -1.41, which is lower than the J Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDS and J, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDS	J	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.41	0.28	-1.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	0.18	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.53	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.39	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FDS and J is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FDS vs. J - Dividend Comparison

FDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than J's 2.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc.	2.03%	1.50%	0.85%	0.80%	0.87%	0.66%	0.91%	1.04%	1.24%	1.13%	1.19%	1.05%
J Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.	2.07%	1.96%	0.76%	0.80%	0.77%	0.60%	0.70%	0.76%	1.03%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FDS vs. J - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDS drawdown since its inception was -61.13%, smaller than the maximum J drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDS and J.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDS	J	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.13%	-74.14%	+13.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.47%	-23.73%	-35.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.13%	-26.37%	-34.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.13%	-39.33%	-21.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.40%	-22.21%	-33.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.96%	-26.18%	+13.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.14%	10.80%	+23.34%

Volatility

FDS vs. J - Volatility Comparison

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (J) at 6.03%. This indicates that FDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than J based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDS	J	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.17%	6.03%	+5.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.24%	24.98%	+5.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.71%	30.81%	+5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.27%	25.30%	+0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.82%	27.50%	-0.68%

Financials

FDS vs. J - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a gross profit of 314.28M and revenue of 611.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.

J - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 765.25M and revenue of 3.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.2%.

FDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported an operating income of 184.96M and revenue of 611.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

J - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported an operating income of 232.56M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

FDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a net income of 133.06M and revenue of 611.02M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

J - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. reported a net income of 133.20M and revenue of 3.29B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.