PortfoliosLab logo
FDS vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FDS and COST is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FDS vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

11,000.00%12,000.00%13,000.00%14,000.00%15,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12,805.81%
14,061.35%
FDS
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FDS:

0.24

COST:

1.39

Sortino Ratio

FDS:

0.51

COST:

1.96

Omega Ratio

FDS:

1.06

COST:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

FDS:

0.28

COST:

1.81

Martin Ratio

FDS:

0.70

COST:

5.32

Ulcer Index

FDS:

7.65%

COST:

5.89%

Daily Std Dev

FDS:

22.30%

COST:

21.91%

Max Drawdown

FDS:

-58.96%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

FDS:

-7.89%

COST:

-6.26%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FDS:

$16.49B

COST:

$450.29B

EPS

FDS:

$14.08

COST:

$17.15

PE Ratio

FDS:

30.86

COST:

59.18

PEG Ratio

FDS:

2.15

COST:

5.34

PS Ratio

FDS:

7.29

COST:

1.71

PB Ratio

FDS:

8.02

COST:

17.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

FDS:

$2.25B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FDS:

$1.22B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

FDS:

$891.51M

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDS achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.29% return. Over the past 10 years, FDS has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 12.07%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.69% annualized return.


FDS

YTD

-5.13%

1M

6.51%

6M

-4.36%

1Y

5.27%

5Y*

11.52%

10Y*

12.07%

COST

YTD

10.29%

1M

4.58%

6M

7.07%

1Y

30.07%

5Y*

29.12%

10Y*

23.69%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDS vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FDS is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FDS is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FDS is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FDS is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FDS is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FDS is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FDS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDS and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.24
1.39
FDS
COST

Dividends

FDS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

FDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than COST's 0.47% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
0.92%0.85%0.80%0.87%0.66%0.91%1.04%1.24%1.13%1.19%1.05%1.08%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

FDS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDS drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDS and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.89%
-6.26%
FDS
COST

Volatility

FDS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.91%. This indicates that FDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.34%
5.91%
FDS
COST

Financials

FDS vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
570.66M
63.72B
(FDS) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FDS vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
52.8%
15.1%
(FDS) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
FDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a gross profit of 301.06M and revenue of 570.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.8%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

FDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported an operating income of 185.49M and revenue of 570.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

FDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a net income of 144.86M and revenue of 570.66M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.