FDS vs. BR
FDS (FactSet Research Systems Inc.) and BR (Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.) are both stocks. FDS operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services), while BR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FDS returned 5.91%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for BR. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FDS vs. BR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDS achieves a -11.79% return, which is significantly higher than BR's -31.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FDS has underperformed BR with an annualized return of 5.91%, while BR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.
FDS
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 13.47%
- YTD
- -11.79%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- 1Y
- -40.68%
- 3Y*
- -13.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.91%
BR
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- -31.25%
- 6M
- -33.14%
- 1Y
- -36.38%
- 3Y*
- 1.54%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
FDS vs. BR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | -11.79% | -38.88% | 1.62% | 19.99% | -16.75% | 47.49% | 25.13% | 35.51% | 5.02% | 19.44% |
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | -31.25% | 0.27% | 11.65% | 56.23% | -25.26% | 21.12% | 26.28% | 30.59% | 7.86% | 39.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDS and BR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2007 | 0.51 |
The correlation between FDS and BR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
FDS:
$9.46B
BR:
$17.85B
FDS:
$15.59
BR:
$9.35
FDS:
16.26
BR:
16.33
FDS:
1.52
BR:
1.44
FDS:
3.98
BR:
2.45
FDS:
4.44
BR:
6.33
FDS:
$2.40B
BR:
$7.32B
FDS:
$1.25B
BR:
$2.29B
FDS:
$821.05M
BR:
$1.98B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDS vs. BR — Risk / Return Rank
FDS
BR
FDS vs. BR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDS | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.74 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.80 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | -1.54 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDS | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 | -1.44 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.03 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.46 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.52 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
FDS vs. BR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDS drawdown since its inception was -61.13%, roughly equal to the maximum BR drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDS and BR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDS | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.13% | -59.02% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.50% | -45.55% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.13% | -45.55% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.13% | -45.55% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.13% | -45.55% | -15.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.65% | -42.04% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.20% | -8.99% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.76% | 23.70% | +14.06% |
Volatility
FDS vs. BR - Volatility Comparison
FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) has a higher volatility of 18.31% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) at 9.19%. This indicates that FDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDS | BR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.31% | 9.19% | +9.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.34% | 21.50% | +13.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.12% | 25.30% | +15.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.65% | 23.42% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.63% | 23.88% | +3.75% |
Dividends
FDS vs. BR - Dividend Comparison
FDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than BR's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BR Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. | 2.49% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.48% | 2.04% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.53% | 1.90% | 2.12% |
FDS FactSet Research Systems Inc. | 1.76% | 1.50% | 0.85% | 0.80% | 0.87% | 0.66% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.05% |
Financials
FDS vs. BR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FDS vs. BR - Profitability Comparison
FDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a gross profit of 314.28M and revenue of 611.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.
BR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 626.90M and revenue of 1.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.1%.
FDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported an operating income of 184.96M and revenue of 611.02M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.
BR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 359.50M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.
FDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FactSet Research Systems Inc. reported a net income of 133.06M and revenue of 611.02M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
BR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 276.30M and revenue of 1.95B, resulting in a net margin of 14.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FDS and BR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDS has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to BR (9.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDS dropped -61.13% vs BR's -59.02%.
FDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.00 vs -1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FDS and BR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer