PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FDS vs. BR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


FDSBR
YTD Return-10.04%-2.97%
1Y Return9.40%32.14%
3Y Return (Ann)8.36%8.75%
5Y Return (Ann)9.98%12.99%
10Y Return (Ann)16.35%20.08%
Sharpe Ratio0.491.78
Daily Std Dev20.00%17.12%
Max Drawdown-58.96%-59.02%
Current Drawdown-12.23%-4.46%

Fundamentals


FDSBR
Market Cap$16.32B$23.42B
EPS$12.63$5.75
PE Ratio33.9134.58
PEG Ratio2.651.68
Revenue (TTM)$2.15B$6.32B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.11B$1.79B
EBITDA (TTM)$796.99M$1.46B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between FDS and BR is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FDS vs. BR - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FDS achieves a -10.04% return, which is significantly lower than BR's -2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FDS has underperformed BR with an annualized return of 16.35%, while BR has yielded a comparatively higher 20.08% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
685.06%
1,297.77%
FDS
BR

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FactSet Research Systems Inc.

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FDS vs. BR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.49
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FDS, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FDS, currently valued at 0.48, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.48
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FDS, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.93
BR
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BR, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.78
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BR, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BR, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BR, currently valued at 1.62, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.62
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BR, currently valued at 8.47, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.008.47

FDS vs. BR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDS Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the BR Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FDS and BR.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.49
1.78
FDS
BR

Dividends

FDS vs. BR - Dividend Comparison

FDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than BR's 1.57% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
0.92%0.80%0.87%0.66%0.91%1.04%1.24%1.13%1.19%1.05%1.08%1.25%
BR
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.57%1.48%2.04%1.33%1.46%1.66%1.77%1.53%1.90%2.12%2.08%1.97%

Drawdowns

FDS vs. BR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDS drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, roughly equal to the maximum BR drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDS and BR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-12.23%
-4.46%
FDS
BR

Volatility

FDS vs. BR - Volatility Comparison

FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) at 5.20%. This indicates that FDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.27%
5.20%
FDS
BR

Financials

FDS vs. BR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items