PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRS vs. FNDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRS vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 15.31% return.


FDRS

1D
1.06%
1M
10.17%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FNDB

1D
0.74%
1M
3.35%
YTD
15.31%
6M
15.58%
1Y
33.57%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
14.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRS vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FDRS
Founder-Led ETF
1.52%-1.10%
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
15.31%-0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRS and FNDB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRS vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRS

FNDB
FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRS vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FDRS vs. FNDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRSFNDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.79

-0.76

Drawdowns

FDRS vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and FNDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRSFNDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-38.17%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

0.00%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-3.66%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

Volatility

FDRS vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRSFNDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.36%

10.73%

+17.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.36%

15.36%

+13.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.36%

17.48%

+10.88%

FDRS vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRS vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison

FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDRS
Founder-Led ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNDB
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF
1.43%1.62%1.74%1.80%1.98%1.63%2.15%2.23%2.41%1.91%2.06%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRS and FNDB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDRS.

FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.

FDRS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. FDRS tracks Founder Led Index, while FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.25% for FNDB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRS and FNDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer