FDRS vs. FNDB
FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Founder Led Index, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
FDRS vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 15.31% return.
FDRS
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- 1Y
- 33.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
FDRS vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 1.52% | -1.10% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 15.31% | -0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRS and FNDB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRS vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
FDRS
FNDB
FDRS vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDRS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.79 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
FDRS vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.64%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.64% | -38.17% | +16.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | 0.00% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -3.66% | -5.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
FDRS vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRS | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 10.73% | +17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 15.36% | +13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.36% | 17.48% | +10.88% |
FDRS vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRS vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.43% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRS and FNDB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDRS.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.
FDRS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. FDRS tracks Founder Led Index, while FNDB tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.25% for FNDB.
Find the right allocation for FDRS and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer