FDRS vs. SCHB
FDRS (Founder-Led ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FDRS tracks the Founder Led Index while SCHB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FDRS charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
FDRS vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDRS achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 10.41% return.
FDRS
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
FDRS vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | -4.82% | -1.34% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 10.41% | -0.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDRS and SCHB is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDRS vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
FDRS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHB
FDRS vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Founder-Led ETF (FDRS) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FDRS | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FDRS vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDRS drawdown since its inception was -21.77%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRS and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDRS | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.77% | -35.27% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.36% | -1.50% | -7.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -4.11% | -5.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
FDRS vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDRS | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.07% | 12.77% | +16.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 17.34% | +11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 18.37% | +10.70% |
FDRS vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDRS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDRS vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
FDRS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDRS Founder-Led ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDRS and SCHB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FDRS.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for FDRS.
FDRS tracks Founder Led Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Corgi Strategies and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FDRS and 0.03% for SCHB.
Find the right allocation for FDRS and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer