FDRR vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FDRR (Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FDRR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FDRR returned 26.53% vs 4.07% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. FDRR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

FDRR vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.

FDRR

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 7.46%
• 1Y: 26.53%
• 3Y*: 20.07%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 6M: 2.37%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	7.87%	17.90%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.32%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and RBIL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.20

Return for Risk

FDRR vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR

FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 74
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDRR	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	4.35	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.30	6.69	-3.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	2.13	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	7.82	-4.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.81	42.95	-30.15

FDRR vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDRR	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-0.52%	-36.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-0.52%	-8.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-0.50%	-2.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-0.07%	-3.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	0.10%	+1.98%

Volatility

FDRR vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that FDRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDRR	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.79%	0.36%	+3.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.68%	0.85%	+7.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.25%	0.95%	+10.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	1.07%	+13.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.86%	1.07%	+15.79%

FDRR vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FDRR vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FDRR Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates	2.16%	2.21%	2.61%	2.93%	2.75%	2.09%	2.85%	2.89%	3.20%	2.89%	0.61%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDRR and RBIL in my portfolio?

FDRR and RBIL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FDRR or RBIL?

FDRR has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, FDRR or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, FDRR leads with 26.53% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, FDRR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FDRR or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 26.53% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDRR or RBIL?

FDRR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDRR or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 2.16% for FDRR.

What is the main difference between FDRR and RBIL?

FDRR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FDRR and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.