PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDRR vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDRR vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDRR achieves a 10.01% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 6.67% return.


FDRR

1D
-0.99%
1M
6.39%
YTD
10.01%
6M
10.38%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
21.03%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.43%
1M
2.68%
YTD
6.67%
6M
6.93%
1Y
17.65%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDRR vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
10.01%21.70%20.24%13.66%-9.73%26.06%8.23%26.86%-3.60%19.29%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
6.67%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%21.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FDRR and QUS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016

0.90

The correlation between FDRR and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDRR vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDRR
QUS

Technology

34.5%
26.3%

Financial Services

12.0%
14.6%

Communication Services

10.7%
10.2%

Healthcare

9.4%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
5.8%

Industrials

8.7%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
9.2%

Energy

3.6%
4.6%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.4%

Utilities

2.4%
3.6%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.3%

Technology

FDRR
34.5%
QUS
26.3%

Financial Services

FDRR
12.0%
QUS
14.6%

Communication Services

FDRR
10.7%
QUS
10.2%

Healthcare

FDRR
9.4%
QUS
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FDRR
8.7%
QUS
5.8%

Industrials

FDRR
8.7%
QUS
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

FDRR
4.8%
QUS
9.2%

Energy

FDRR
3.6%
QUS
4.6%

Real Estate

FDRR
2.9%
QUS
1.4%

Utilities

FDRR
2.4%
QUS
3.6%

Basic Materials

FDRR
2.2%
QUS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDRR vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDRR
FDRR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FDRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDRR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FDRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDRR Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDRR vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDRRQUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.85

1.95

+0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.96

2.81

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.35

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.69

2.59

+1.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.70

11.54

+4.17

FDRR vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDRR and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDRRQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

1.95

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.78

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.77

+0.04

Drawdowns

FDRR vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDRR drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, which is greater than QUS's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDRR and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDRRQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.52%

-33.78%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.52%

-6.85%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.04%

-13.94%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-22.30%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-0.50%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-3.70%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

1.53%

+0.47%

Volatility

FDRR vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that FDRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDRRQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

1.78%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.31%

6.66%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

9.09%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.00%

14.33%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

16.42%

+0.46%

FDRR vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDRR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDRR vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

FDRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDRR
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates
2.10%2.21%2.61%2.93%2.75%2.09%2.85%2.89%3.20%2.89%0.61%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDRR and QUS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDRR has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDRR dropped -36.52% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, FDRR leads with 12.34% vs 11.08% for QUS. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDRR has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FDRR.

FDRR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.31% for QUS.

FDRR tracks Fidelity Dividend Index for Rising Rates, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FDRR and 0.15% for QUS.

FDRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDRR and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer